Solunars

I think if you're there at the time it occurs, you're covered. However, there is always the possibility that the 30-hour before-and-after window has some effect - enough chance that if you can manage to be there 30 hours early, there's no reason not to. Still, if you're there at the actual moment of...

I haven't tried that as a "programming the year" thing, though I've long thought that the custom of celebrating people's birthdays came from a casual folk-observation that how this day goes has portents for the year ahead. Back in the '70s and early '80s, I did, for a few years, keep a minute-by-min...

Steve, I thought you might want a full breakdown of angularities. I think you probably aren't using the Excel spreadsheet that lets you calculate natal planets' angularity in the SSR, and they matter this year. (The only foreground planets are natal planets.) t Moon-Jupiter op 0°47' in mundo t Moon-...

From the information you gave (I haven't redone the harts), LA is not SO better as to warrant centering things here. We'd love to see you, of course, and there will be two weekly classes going on at that time (oops, no: last Solar & Lunar Returns class is the 18th, and the Foundations class then tak...

I can't speak for exactly what Kay meant. At best, it was very casually written and obscure. It seems, though, that she is just saying that the poles demarcate where the ecliptic is. (At least, that's a technically correct statement that she might mean.) She seems to be saying that what needs to be ...

Tony was primarily an entertainer. Magic was his schtick. He was a Pisces-Cancer, which portrays his being fundamentally an actor.

Soft Alpaca wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:57 am

Does anything Uranus show up in charts of people like Anton LaVey?

I don't think I have Tony' birth data, although he always struck me as more Plutonian (but also a fairly jovial guy in person).

Soft Alpaca wrote: ↑

Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:45 am

Another good chart to check. That's rather intresting in any case.

His ego was strong and anchored on seeming uniquely bad.

Here is the angularity of everything in the Demi-Lunar, calculated mundanely for you. Moon is the closest, Neptune and natal Jupiter next, and, yes, you have TWO Jupiters. r Mars on Dsc -7°02' t Jupiter on Dsc -6°36' t Moon on Asc -0°06' ---------------------------- r Jupiter on Dsc +0°29" r Neptune...

Open for business!

Recognizable mythological figures for the constellation near [ emphasis added JAE ] the pole... So, I assume with these above quoted words, there is a zodiac degree for the pole of the ecliptic. Your interpretation is wrong. The key word in the quoted sentence above is NEAR. Objects NEAR the pole h...

Off the top of my head, Aleister Crowley had an angular Sun which was closely (maybe to the degree) trine-sextile an exact Saturn-Uranus opposition.

Soft Alpaca wrote: ↑

Tue Sep 17, 2019 11:51 pm

I was wondering too there are any examples of famous people with this association.

What association, exactly?

There is a circle wrapped around the Earth where this contact will exist exactly is close. Just like there is a circle around the globe where a given planet is on Ascendant or Descendant, etc.

It is exactly as rare as, for example, the same planets being the same distance from ascendant.

Just keep asking yourself, what is the longitude of the North Pole.

SteveS wrote: ↑

Tue Sep 17, 2019 2:57 pm

Jim wrote:

The ecliptic poles have all simultaneous longitudes.

And what are their longitudes?

There is NO specific zodiacal longitude. The poles have ALL 360° of longitude at the same time. They are the only two points on the celestial sphere than can never have any specific longitude.

No. All quotidian angle contacts work ecliptically, not mundanely. So, on rare occasions when I see with my eyes a partile cnj of a planet in a Q chart, the planet's Azi in the 'Reports' section of SF will always be 90 or 270? If it were conjunct mundanely, this would be so EXCEPT you only see the ...

Jim, could not the precise sidereal degree of the pole of the ecliptic have the symbolic potency for an angular mundane point? The pole of the ecliptic has no zodiacal degree in the same way that the north pole of Earth has no specific geographic longitude. The ecliptic poles have all simultaneous ...

Jim, what does Holly and Trent mean with the following statement: ...because I want to make sure the strongest candidate unmasks Biden... That quote is attribute to Rafael Shimunov, a former national creative director for WFP and 2016 Sanders volunteer. He apparently feels that there is something t...

Question Jim: In any CapQ/CanQ chart, would as our eyes view the Q charts alone -- all progressed partile planetary conjunctions to the Q Vertex be in mundane partile conjunction? As mentioned above: (1) No. All quotidian angle contacts work ecliptically, not mundanely. (2) Additionally, the statis...

There is news today that Sanders' campaign may be caving faster than expected. It's premature to say that it is, but this is worth reading:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... ar-AAHrmkq

It might be useful to trim the full, lengthy breakdown of the chart with which I began this thread and identify the strongest factors - Class 1 angularities (with closest highlighted) and the closest aspects (with partile highlighted). Here's what we get: Sun on WP 0°47' Uranus on Asc 1°03' Pluto on...

I had started, and never finished, a project of studying all Libsolars in election years in U.S. history. As far as I got, it described the unusual conditions around the election pretty well. I really should finish it so we have a larger picture of how that operates. I think Steve might be right to ...

With all the other Dem candidates not on the above list, I seriously ask all who follow politics closely: Who not on the above list do you give a good chance to win Dem Prez? The only name that isn't on that list and should be is Buttigieg. I don't think he'll get the Prez nom, but he's solidly in ...

I do think it refers specifically to the election. (It's reminiscent of the 2016 Libsolar that looked like an all-out military attack on the country, which in fact happened - but only as a cyber attack.)

I just don't think we know what question this is answering.