"Outstanding" SLR or not?

Q&A and discussion on Sidereal Lunar Returns.
Post Reply
User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

"Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:22 am

I have a Lunar return today and if birth time is 23.40 the ecliptic aspects show an "outstanding" SLR with SLR Uranus partile conjunct SLR MC and SLR Venus 1,5° from ASC as well as SLR Jup about 3° from IC. SLR Neptune is almost exact square rel. ASC.

IF birth time is slightly off this SLR is not going to be outstanding at all, at least not with a partile aspect to angles.

Let's see how this one goes down.

User avatar
Danica
Irish
Irish
Posts: 2163
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:19 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Danica » Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:36 pm

For 23:40 birth time, mundo angularity for this SLR is:

Ve 01*10 from AC
Ur 01*20 from MC (partile mund square)
Ju 03*56 from IC

What is the other birth time you're speculating with/testing?
QUID VOLIS ILUD FAC

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:47 am

Thanks Danica. Good to know the mundane positions.

The other possible birth time I've been looking into is around 23.20.

User avatar
Danica
Irish
Irish
Posts: 2163
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:19 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Danica » Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:17 pm

Arena wrote:
Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:47 am
The other possible birth time I've been looking into is around 23.20.
for BT 23:20

Ju IC 03*29'
Ve AC 04*06'
Ur MC 08*26'
QUID VOLIS ILUD FAC

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:32 pm

Well, this one has come to an end, with a new one starting today.
It was not outstanding, I believe the time is a bit off and there were actually no partile aspects nor Venus and Uranus that close to AC and MC.

Well, I do not think that Lunar returns are really that important at all - but if they are it seems my birth time is indeed a bit off because this one was not really outstanding.

The next SLR shows me that with 23.40 birth time my natal Sun would partile square the SLR AC, but with 23.20 birth time the SLR MC would be conjunct natal Mars which is also conjoined by the SLR Nnode.

Ebertin about Dragon's head conjunct MC:
The establishment of an association for the attainment of joint objectives. Unions based on a mutual inner understanding.
And when that conjoins Mars he says:
Comradeship and team-spirit, an intense working together with one's colleagues, an association or organisation fighting to uphold the common ideas and principles. Inner attachment and physical attraction.

User avatar
Jupiter Sets at Dawn
Irish
Irish
Posts: 2038
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 7:03 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Jupiter Sets at Dawn » Sun Oct 08, 2017 5:40 pm

Arena, do you keep a log of aspects and when (by your birth certificate) you'd expect them to show some influence, and exactly when you saw evidence of the influence?

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Thu Nov 16, 2017 3:05 pm

Jupiter Sets at Dawn wrote:
Sun Oct 08, 2017 5:40 pm
Arena, do you keep a log of aspects and when (by your birth certificate) you'd expect them to show some influence, and exactly when you saw evidence of the influence?
Ah, sorry I missed your post. I probably do not keep as accurate a record as I should... but am keeping records of when I notice Mars effects. I guess I must start keeping more comprehensive records, but I am just kinda very very busy these days/weeks/months.

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Thu Nov 16, 2017 3:15 pm

The next SLR shows me that with 23.40 birth time my natal Sun would partile square the SLR AC, but with 23.20 birth time the SLR MC would be conjunct natal Mars which is also conjoined by the SLR Nnode.

Ebertin about Dragon's head conjunct MC:
The establishment of an association for the attainment of joint objectives. Unions based on a mutual inner understanding.

And when that conjoins Mars he says:
Comradeship and team-spirit, an intense working together with one's colleagues, an association or organisation fighting to uphold the common ideas and principles. Inner attachment and physical attraction.
So, now this October LR is over.
That month was extremely busy. I took a business trip with my business partner to Spain to look at potential investments or rentals to startup a little serviced apartment section there. Lots and lots of driving involved. Whilst we were over there we were also communicating back to Scotland about a possible land purchase and a building project. Plus we were negotiating a rental deal that was then made ready for us to sign on Nov 6th (new LR though for the signing). And also, while I was in Spain my life-partner's grandfather died. My partner was already in Iceland with the kids, so after my Spain trip, I booked a flight to Iceland and attended the funeral and met some friends.
Extremely busy month indeed!

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:39 am

Ok, so here is another one that has just started.
IF birth time is right as 23.40, this SLR shows SLR Pluto partile SLR IC, which falls partile to n. MC. This same SLR shows SLR Uranus partile the SLR Vx and SLR ASC partile n. Uranus while SLR Saturn is right around the n. DSC. Looks very separative.

The only thing I would suspect or I can foresee or am coming to a decision about is to end the business relationship that I have with my business partner. I don't need a partnership and I think it is much better to not have to rely on other people or to not have to deal with when they get themselves caught up and worked up in their own creation of whirlwind of unnecessary and unuseful emotions :D Observing that can be a bit funny at times, but it isn't useful in business.
I have simply seen enough of him being too young and not really willing to grow up and look himself in the mirror about certain things that are detrimental to his progress. I like him in many ways and I see potential in him, but he is just not ready to be my partner at this point in time :) I need people in business to be able to not be emotional about things, to keep their emotions aside and in check. He is not able to. I guess I may be becoming more and more Plutonic with time/age.

However, with the partile Pluto and then the Saturn conj. n. DSC, I wouldn't be surprised to have news about another death in the family.
Last edited by Arena on Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:54 am, edited 3 times in total.

SteveS
Synetic Member
Synetic Member
Posts: 1256
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by SteveS » Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:27 am

Hi Arena,
Clearly the most potent aspect for your June 11 SLR (Edinburgh) is a very potent mundane paran square of SLR t. Pluto 7:29:32 ST anti-culminating at 7:25:42 ST to your Natal Uranus rising on your SLR Asc at 7:27:44, a very potent paran, should produce an outstanding Uranus-Pluto incident relative to your immediate environment. Keep us informed. A SLR transiting Pluto to Natal Uranus Paran :)

SLR Pluto anti-culminates at 7:29:32 ST
Natal Uranus rising at 7:27:44 ST (Edinburgh)
SLR Asc rising at 7:25:42 ST

All less than 1 degree orb (partile).

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:43 am

Just noted another partile conjunction as I casted the chart to my birth place. SLR Saturn is partile SLR IC to birth place. Natal Pluto is not far from SLR ASC to birth place and I also notice that SLR Venus is partile natal Snode while SLR Mars is partile SLR Nnode. I guess that this SLR will bring about things that I can not predict, but it seems like it could involve my close family if we see IC as being about family. Also, the SLR Pluto is approaching a partile trine to the Moon.
Last edited by Arena on Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Nabu
Posts: 5818
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Jim Eshelman » Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:28 am

I agree with Steve, transiting Pluto to natal Uranus exactly angular is the thrust of the chart.

I have no reason to think that SSR planets angular in the SLR have any meaning or import, so I wouldn't emphasize that. The Pluto-to-Uranus is simpler.

r Uranus is 0°49' before Asc
t Pluto is 1°05' before IC
-- t Pluto sq. r Asc 0°16' in mundo
t Venus is 9°10' before MC

Natal Uranus has been adjusted for precession and inserted in to the SLR's mundoscope. The aspect is quite exact. It does look separative, but not in a Saturn sense - just dramatic change, rebellion against existing forms, etc. Natal Uranus is slightly closer, so the need for change and to be free of something and freshly born likely originates from you; but the universe is quite willing to meet you in rearranging the pieces. The fact that Venus is also foreground (barely) slightly tips the outcome slightly toward the positive (in the sense of you feeling good about things). - The Venus is squared by Uranus, but Uranus is middleground.

No partile aspects of SLR planets to natal planets other than the mundane square of Pluto to your Uranus.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:49 am

I have no reason to think that SSR planets angular in the SLR have any meaning or import, so I wouldn't emphasize that.
:shock: ...just realised that I wrote SSR instead of SLR in some places :) ... when I was in all those cases talking about SLR planets and angles. Sorry about that confusion. I have now edited and changed the posts accordingly.

User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Nabu
Posts: 5818
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Jim Eshelman » Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:25 am

And I missed that you said the Saturn was around the natal Descendant. I kept looking for a Saturn somewhere around SLR Dsc and kept not finding it :)

It does look like you've primarily moved past Saturn to your Descendant - especially if (as I think is true) these only work ecliptically. IIRC it's still partile mundanely (precessed back to your birthdate and inserted into your natal mundoscope), but in the normal transit cycle - if this birth time is correct - it seems to have cleared.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com

User avatar
Arena
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 706
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 12:24 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Arena » Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:45 am

It does look like you've primarily moved past Saturn to your Descendant - especially if (as I think is true) these only work ecliptically.
Maybe there is something distorting my mind today, not sure :D ... but how did you come to this conclusion? When I look at the transits to my natal chart they show me that Saturn is in retro motion coming into partile conjunction with my natal DSC tomorrow, will be exact conjunction later this month and then move direct and come back to hit it in November?

User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Nabu
Posts: 5818
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: "Outstanding" SLR or not?

Post by Jim Eshelman » Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:48 am

Dang, you're right (you have more reason to be on top of that than me). I forgot it was still going to go back that far, - It's out of partile orb for now, but it will spend a lot of time there later this year.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest