LAX dry ice bombs

Analyses of distinct mundane events, using the methods of Sidereal mundane astrology
Post Reply
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19068
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

LAX dry ice bombs

Post by Jim Eshelman »

(10/15/2013)

On October 13, 2013, at 7:00 PM, a dry ice bomb exploded at Los Angeles International Airport. No injuries were reported, though some flights were delayed.

Then, October 14 at 8:30 PM, a second dry ice bomb exploded and, soon after, two others were found. Again, no injuries were reported.

This is of interest to me because, eight months ago on February 4, I picked today as the date of an incendiary event in Los Angeles. However, of all the forms of explosions that could have been planted, this is pretty much the only one that does NOT fit my prediction. Unless something more serious (or at least inflammatory) happens in the next 24 hours or so, I will judge the prediction to have failed.

The prediction was here: http://solunars.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2341#p8797
In discussion Garth Allen's "New Tool" discussion of fires, I wrote the following:
Jim Eshelman wrote:For example, using more angles and crossings than Bradley used at the time, the current Capsolar for Los Angeles has transiting Mars cross angles on the following dates (ecliptical calculations for convenience of the example). Notice how they all occur within the same month. Will October 2013 see an unusual raging of fire in or near LA?

t. Mars square Q2 MC 10/6/2013
t. Mars on Q2 WP 10/17/2013
t. Mars on Q2 Dsc 10/30/2013
Bradley wrote:Subsequently, for most localities, Mars can make only two contacts with the anglular cusps in a year's time. In some regions, it is possible to have three actual contacts with the angles before the sidereal year expires. When Mars is within orb of such cuspal conjunctions, the general area is dangerously exposed to the likelihood of serious fires and appalling public tragedies. The closer the contact, the greater the danger. And if malefics hound the angles of the current Lunar ingress figures, or the quotidian transit is reinforcedby a similar adverse pattern in the static framework of the Solar ingresses, the possibility of a conflagration of some sort becomes a virtual inevitability.
Note that Mars transits across the LA Capsolar IC on October 12. T. Mars is a couple degrees off the quotidian Westpoint and MC. And ingress Mars is only 2° from the Q2 Ascendant.

The constellation of factors tightly enough to overlap and reinforce each other on October 14, 2013, when a Moon-Mars opposition occurs within 2° of the quotidian EP, ingress Mars is precisely on the quotidian Ascendant, and t. Mars is barely more than a degree from the Capsolar IC. Add the October 12 Caplunar with Mars only a few degrees from the Ascendant (Mercury being the closest planet), and we have a significant fire or bloody violence risk (from a vehicular accident?). And the Cansolar quotidian has ingress Saturn in the degree of the IC and - more to the point - t. Saturn within a degree of square the Ascendant.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19068
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: LAX dry ice bombs

Post by Jim Eshelman »

Now, how about this ice bomb? Let's take the first explosion as marking the event: October 13, 2013, at 7:00 PM, at LAX.

QUARTER: CANSOLAR
Saturn on WP (0°48')

MONTH: CAPLUNAR
Dormant. - The prior Liblunar has Neptune 1°16' below the Ascendant and Mars 3°21' below the Descendant.

TRANSITS TO CAPSOLAR
t. Mars on IC (0°51')

CAPSOLAR QUOTIDIAN
i. Mars on Asc (0°11')
t. Mercury sq. Asc (0°23'), sq. i. Mars (0°12')
t. Mars on WP (2°18')
i. Neptune sq. MC (0°06')

CANSOLAR QUOTIDIAN
t. Saturn sq. Asc (0°07')
i. Saturn on IC (0°42')
(I guess that's the ice?) <g>
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19068
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: LAX dry ice bombs

Post by Jim Eshelman »

DDonovanKinsolving wrote:
Jim Eshelman wrote: (I guess that's the ice?) <g>
Perhaps adding to Saturn's known cold influence, how about this for Dry Ice Bomb #1:

Comet ISON
SZ Long. Leo 3:45
Lat. N 2:31

RA(D.M) 151:44
RA(H:M:S) 10:06:55
Decl. N 14:18

I'm using as coordinates for LAX 33N57 118W24. The Capsolar RAMC is 22:01:43, making C/ISON 5m12s from the IC, 1d53m distant in the mundoscope. It's closer ecliptically, as the Capsolar IC is Leo 3:20. Not making any claims here, I'm simply offering it as a data point; but isn't it curious that this cosmic ice-ball might alter the explosive event; we normally expect the generation of heat, and it's been changed into the opposite?

-Derek
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19068
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: LAX dry ice bombs

Post by Jim Eshelman »

Fascinating!

Especially since a comet is primarily made out of... dry ice! :!:
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
Post Reply