Who feels it more?

Q&A and discussion about Synastry, i.e., relationship analysis through the comparison of two horoscopes.
Post Reply
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

Originally posted by myself on Wed Jun 08, 2016 1:02 pm
All times of postings are in MYT/UTC+8.

Generally, in synastry, when there's a co-aspect between two people (for the sake of simplicity let's say it's a love-inducing interaspect), who would feel the love even more?
The inner planet person?

And another question:
In planet-angle contacts, usually the angle person "feels" it more or gets affected by the planet person.
However, in Venus-angle contacts, (according to the interpretation resources here) Venus feels it more!
VENUS-ANGLE
Venus loves the Angle. There is real, serious, penetrating, moving love here (especially when Venus is on the Horizon).
In some other websites, they state that the angle person loves the Venus person, which theoretically sounds more logical, especially when using Jim's method of using the duo's charts as transits to each other.
Transit-wise, you wouldn't feel anything if the transiting angles conjunct your r.Venus, but you'd feel great if tr.Venus conjuncts your natal angles!
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by Jupiter Sets At Dawn on Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:02 pm
Jupiter Sets At Dawn wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:Generally, in synastry, when there's a co-aspect between two people (for the sake of simplicity let's say it's a love-inducing interaspect), who would feel the love even more?
The inner planet person?
Who feels Teh Love isn't dependent on inner or outer planets. It's dependent on the ease with which the planets involved can express themselves, and what they are expressing. For instance, Saturn is unlikely to feel "love." Security, maybe. Love is a Venus feeling, and depending on what you mean by love, it's something only Venus feels.
In planet-angle contacts, usually the angle person "feels" it more or gets affected by the planet person.
However, in Venus-angle contacts, (according to the interpretation resources here) Venus feels it more!
VENUS-ANGLE
Venus loves the Angle.
Elsewhere, Jim quotes Fagan, who says:
VENUS. In the intrinsic method of interpretation, Venus represents the one who takes the positive part in the act of love, to wit, the lover. Should one's Venus interaspect another's Ascendant, Midheaven, Sun, Moon, or Mars, then one is apt to fall in love with those others more especially should the Moon or Mars be involved. The reactions of the other to such advancements depend on the nature of the planet interaspected. Such love is welcomed should Venus interaspect Jupiter, but is repelled if the interaspect involves Saturn. Not infrequently, the Saturn individual feels mortified by such advances. Should the interaspect be with Mars, the latter often may be forced to fight to ward off such advances.
There's more on that page.
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by Jim Eshelman on Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:43 pm
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:Transit-wise, you wouldn't feel anything if the transiting angles conjunct your r.Venus, but you'd feel great if tr.Venus conjuncts your natal angles!
You mean like the way you don't feel anything just because some quotidian angle hits your Venus? :twisted: :o :D
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by TheScales_BothWays on Wed Jun 08, 2016 5:25 pm
Jupiter Sets At Dawn wrote:Who feels Teh Love isn't dependent on inner or outer planets. It's dependent on the ease with which the planets involved can express themselves, and what they are expressing. For instance, Saturn is unlikely to feel "love." Security, maybe. Love is a Venus feeling, and depending on what you mean by love, it's something only Venus feels.
Ah. :idea:
Hmm. So different planets give "feels" of love. Obvious enough. :mrgreen:
Though lunar love might be similar to Venusian love (the all-important Sun-Moon interaspect!) with the "motherliness" of Moon in the mix.
Jupiter Sets At Dawn wrote:Elsewhere, Jim quotes Fagan, who says:
....
There's more on that page.
Thank you! :D
So I'm attracted to Plutonian people, eh? Maybe, maybe not. ("All or nothing?") :P

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:Transit-wise, you wouldn't feel anything if the transiting angles conjunct your r.Venus, but you'd feel great if tr.Venus conjuncts your natal angles!
You mean like the way you don't feel anything just because some quotidian angle hits your Venus? :twisted: :o :D
:shock:
*Mouth held agape* :o
Uh..um..uh..Jim..I have no words to say. You know how to talk alright. LOL :mrgreen: :P
So now I wonder is Venus-angle a one-sided interaspect, or would the Venus person feel the angle's love, and love the Angle just as much as the Angle? (without much of the typical effort needed to impress someone who's not yet interested in you)
I know some (just a few) people who one-sidedly loved the angle person of their Venus, and either the angle person (acts like [s]he?) doesn't know or ain't that interested, or the angle doesn't get the chance to express it, which may not be an synastrical problem.
I think other factors of their synastry and their character needs to be considered too.
But yeah, the first question!
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by Jim Eshelman on Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:39 pm
Jim Eshelman wrote:One answer to "who feels it more" rests in the answer to another question: Which of the two people has more powerful feeling responses in general? (Some people feel everything strongly - some don't.)

I've tried to make clear in the synastry interpretations when there is a one-sided tendency on this, and on many cases there is not a difference. For example, Moon-Neptune seems bilateral (which might not be a surprise, given the nature of the planets). Sun-Moon is reciprocal. (Most of these are probably reciprocal ultimately - but they may not seem that way all the time in practice. For example, with Mercury-Mars, both parties argue, though one usually can see a bias of which one is more likely to pull the verbal attack from the other. Moon-Mars seems mutually passionate and mutually pain-inflicting, but it isn't at all perfectly bilateral at root, since a major characteristic is the Mars person doing everything possible to draw an emotional response from the Moon person. Etc.)
'
Venus, though, is the one who loves - the expression (outflow) of love. And I've had enough Venus-to-angle interchange relationships in life to know that it is quite reliable that Venus easily, deeply, smoothly loves the angle, with no guarantee built into the relationship of whether the angle will ever feel that way as well. Most often, there are other aspects in play that tell the rest of the story. Also, people naturally respond to being actively loved and shown affection, and that's what angle is getting from Venus, so there will be that sort of natural response. But, in a big sense, as long as we are only talking about this one interchange, there is nothing to suggest any response from angle at all.

My "personal history" synastry spreadsheet has 11 women that have had some significant (longterm or brief) personal relationship importance to me, where my Venus sits on their angle. Of these 11, five fall in the "very special" group, including my first wife and my current mate (with whom I've been for several years), another woman I lived with (for a surprisingly short time, in retrospect) and loved deeply, and two women I dated a non-trival length of time and with whom I had very intense emotional and sexual relationships. In fact, Venus is not gentle only in any of these; all were among the most sexual intense relationships of my life. The other six were all briefer relationships, with at least four of them having clear, easy affection, but nothing overwhelming or enduring. (I was out of contact with all but one of them almost immediately on ceasing to be actively connected, and, with the one who remains a Facebook friend, I don't really know where any of the others are today.)

So there's a range, but the lowest level is "honest affection," and the best is "marry her, fast!" (or the equivalent).

Obviously, in the first five I mentioned, there was/is two-way love. This was shown in different ways. For example, I not only have Venus on my first wife's Ascendant, she has a 4' Venus-Jupiter conjunction within a degree of opposite my Moon and close to my Descendant (bilateral Venus-angle.

In contrast, I have a list of five women where their Venus is on one of my angles. Two of these are in the "significant" category - my first wife, mentioned above, and the only one-night encounter I've ever put in the top category: For years to follow, I rated that one night as the most powerful, overwhelming sexual experience of my life. And yet, I can't at all say I loved her at all. (We were friendly, and I certainly appreciated her, but that was all.) Of the other three were, one was a two-direction Venus-angle, another (who stayed friends for years and I cared about more than a little) had many powerful interchanges, and the final one was of no long-term consequence or even short-term affection beyond friendliness.

Venus does the loving - the powerful, desiring, enraptured-by-the-other loving.
TheScales_BothWays wrote:
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:Transit-wise, you wouldn't feel anything if the transiting angles conjunct your r.Venus, but you'd feel great if tr.Venus conjuncts your natal angles!
You mean like the way you don't feel anything just because some quotidian angle hits your Venus? :twisted: :o :D
:shock:
*Mouth held agape* :o
Uh..um..uh..Jim..I have no words to say. You know how to talk alright. LOL :mrgreen: :P
Well, yeah, it's what I do <g>.
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by TheScales_BothWays on Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:46 am
Jim Eshelman wrote:One answer to "who feels it more" rests in the answer to another question: Which of the two people has more powerful feeling responses in general? (Some people feel everything strongly - some don't.)
Yes I definitely meant that^^^ when asking the question. :P
Jim Eshelman wrote:Venus, though, is the one who loves - the expression (outflow) of love. And I've had enough Venus-to-angle interchange relationships in life to know that it is quite reliable that Venus easily, deeply, smoothly loves the angle, with no guarantee built into the relationship of whether the angle will ever feel that way as well. Most often, there are other aspects in play that tell the rest of the story. Also, people naturally respond to being actively loved and shown affection, and that's what angle is getting from Venus, so there will be that sort of natural response. But, in a big sense, as long as we are only talking about this one interchange, there is nothing to suggest any response from angle at all.
Yes, this is what I expectewd to hear of Venus-angle.
So there's a range, but the lowest level is "honest affection," and the best is "marry her, fast!" (or the equivalent).
LOL I can find this true in so many real-life examples haha :lol:
Jim Eshelman wrote:Venus does the loving - the powerful, desiring, enraptured-by-the-other loving.
Got it! ;)
And thank you so much for the lucid explanation! It's like adding sparkle to an already clear glass of water BTW—all the better! :mrgreen:
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:Transit-wise, you wouldn't feel anything if the transiting angles conjunct your r.Venus, but you'd feel great if tr.Venus conjuncts your natal angles!
You mean like the way you don't feel anything just because some quotidian angle hits your Venus? :twisted: :o :D
:shock:
*Mouth held agape* :o
Uh..um..uh..Jim..I have no words to say. You know how to talk alright. LOL :mrgreen: :P
Well, yeah, it's what I do <g>.
Oh you Virgo-Aquariuses are always like this haha.
On second thought, you're the only confirmed Virgo-Aquarius that I know of TBH.
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by Jim Eshelman on Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:54 am
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:On second thought, you're the only confirmed Virgo-Aquarius that I know of TBH. :P
Leonard Cohen. Aleister Crowley. Paul foster Case. Dennis Kusinich. R.D. Laing. Scott Bakula (my almost astro-twin). David Lee Roth (my almost astro-twin).
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by TheScales_BothWays on Sat Jun 11, 2016 2:38 am
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:On second thought, you're the only confirmed Virgo-Aquarius that I know of TBH. :P
Leonard Cohen. Aleister Crowley. Paul foster Case. Dennis Kusinich. R.D. Laing. Scott Bakula (my almost astro-twin). David Lee Roth (my almost astro-twin).
And now I know their existence in this world (lol I'm so rude :( )
Oh wait, wow, I didn't know that Scott Baluka was just born a day ahead of you! Cool! 8-)
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by Jim Eshelman on Sat Jun 11, 2016 3:47 am
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:Oh wait, wow, I didn't know that Scott Baluka was just born a day ahead of you! Cool! 8-)
A few hours, actually, in St. Louis. Not hard to link Quantum Leap and Star Trek: Enterprise to an Aquarius Moon, eh? (All TV Star Trek series captains were Spoke Suns except for Kate Mulgrew, an Aries - to be a tough as nails female.) Especially when young, he has the classic, highly distinctive "pretty man" Venus angular look, so I've suspected around 2:15 PM or 7:00 PM.

And David Lee Roth was the same day. October 10, 1954, also in Indiana.
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by TheScales_BothWays on Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:22 pm
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:Oh wait, wow, I didn't know that Scott Baluka was just born a day ahead of you! Cool! 8-)
A few hours, actually, in St. Louis. Not hard to link Quantum Leap and Star Trek: Enterprise to an Aquarius Moon, eh?
Nope, not at all! In fact, Aquarius is just the sign that I would expect! ;)
Jim Eshelman wrote:(All TV Star Trek series captains were Spoke Suns except for Kate Mulgrew, an Aries - to be a tough as nails female.)
Ah, interesting! :idea:
Jim Eshelman wrote:Especially when young, he has the classic, highly distinctive "pretty man" Venus angular look, so I've suspected around 2:15 PM or 7:00 PM.
Well whaddayaknow, I'm actually guessing someone's birth time right now, assuming that he has Venus angular. (Well everyone thinks he looks good. He's a double-Scorpio and an artist! And his works may not seem so Neptunian.)
I remember you stating that you can guess a Venus angular 4 times out of 5, so if I post his birth details and link his FB profile here, (or via PM), could you do that for me? :mrgreen:
I'm wondering how he could be so interested in art while being a double Scorpio. He being interested in art could just add to the fact that he may be an angular Venus person.

Trivial matters aside,
Jim Eshelman wrote:And David Lee Roth was the same day. October 10, 1954, also in Indiana.
Oh, in Indiana too?!
Is there something in you and your astro-twins that make you three famous in what you guys do? :mrgreen:

And, another question!
With people not of one's desired sex (I suppose "desired sex" is what you would say for an LGBT-friendly version of "opposite sex"'?) , would this aspect manifest itself as dear friendships, since Venus is also the planet of friendship?
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by Arena on Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:07 pm
Arena wrote:I think that when you look at synastry for real couples you will always find mutual aspects of love and affection. It is not a one way street. So it is kind of difficult to begin to measure "who feels it more" in those cases, because most likely those mutual astro aspects make up synastry so that both feel it. :)
After looking into a few synastry charts of real couples I've noticed the luminaries contact as well as Venus contacts in their charts - but always there are some mutual contacts. One may have the Venus touch the angle of the other while that one has his/her Venus aspecting the luminaries or another planet.
Imo you can not isolate the answer to the question this thread is about, unless that is an isolated and only aspect in the synastry. That Venus on the other's angle may also be aspected to a planet... and if that synastry with Venus on angle also has a Sun-Moon contact as well or possibly the other's Venus to Mars or Pluto, then both will "feel it".

We have to be careful not to look at certain aspects in astrology in isolation
- we have to look at the whole picture, always.

For Venus angular, look at the beautiful facial features of Justin Trudeau and then take a look at his chart. He has Venus on his Vx. He appears extremely friendly and is somehow graceful. Take a look at Victoria Beckham, Venus-Jupiter conj on MC ...but then there are lots of very beautiful people who do not have Venus angular, f.ex Sophia Loren and Penelope Cruz. Look at Brad Pitt, a very very handsome man, he does not have Venus angular, but has a partile Venus-Moon conjunction.
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by TheScales_BothWays on Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:51 am
Arena wrote:I think that when you look at synastry for real couples you will always find mutual aspects of love and affection. It is not a one way street. So it is kind of difficult to begin to measure "who feels it more" in those cases, because most likely those mutual astro aspects make up synastry so that both feel it.
After looking into a few synastry charts of real couples I've noticed the luminaries contact as well as Venus contacts in their charts - but always there are some mutual contacts. One may have the Venus touch the angle of the other while that one has his/her Venus aspecting the luminaries or another planet.
Imo you can not isolate the answer to the question this thread is about, unless that is an isolated and only aspect in the synastry. That Venus on the other's angle may also be aspected to a planet... and if that synastry with Venus on angle also has a Sun-Moon contact as well or possibly the other's Venus to Mars or Pluto, then both will "feel it".

We have to be careful not to look at certain aspects in astrology in isolation - we have to look at the whole picture, always.
True. I must concur, but I've seen myself this aspect working so beautifully alone that it just really piqued my curiosity. ;) :idea:
Arena wrote:For Venus angular, look at the beautiful facial features of Justin Trudeau and then take a look at his chart. He has Venus on his Vx. He appears extremely friendly and is somehow graceful. Take a look at Victoria Beckham, Venus-Jupiter conj on MC ...but then there are lots of very beautiful people who do not have Venus angular, f.ex Sophia Loren and Penelope Cruz. Look at Brad Pitt, a very very handsome man, he does not have Venus angular, but has a partile Venus-Moon conjunction.
Thank you for your suggestions Arena. True, beauty can exist in anyone, Venus angular in them or not.
For him (the Scorpian artist) however his lunar Scorpio might be an added factor—I know two guys who have similar basic facial (and to an extent, bodily) features and looks as him—one's a lunar Scorpio too, and another which I don't even know his birthday but I strongly suspect that he has Moon in Scorpio too.
In general I've seen the Moon sign working fairly well in showing the types of look of someone. 8-)
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by Jim Eshelman on Sun Jun 12, 2016 4:06 am
Jim Eshelman wrote:
TheScales_BothWays wrote:
Jim Eshelman wrote:And David Lee Roth was the same day. October 10, 1954, also in Indiana.
Oh, in Indiana too?!
Is there something in you and your astro-twins that make you three famous in what you guys do? :mrgreen:
Well, I don't think I deserve "famous" in the way that they do. Nonetheless, something about births in that general area that I've long noticed making a stand-out difference is the Jupiter-Uranus partile conjunction.

You might find it interesting to do a little experiment to answer the question, "What did the universe go through - what decision making process - to produce the moment of your birth?" Treat your birth as an event that came into being, just like anything else - an event for the world in general. What was the universe seeking to manifest in the moment and place of your birth? (This is another way of asking what the cosmic intent was at the exact intersection of time and space you were born.) Treating this as a series of "decisions" - why this particular aspect and not another, why this angularity and not something else? - may help sharpen your sense of what distinguishes you, of all people, from everyone else around you: what the universe accomplished in exuding you.

As an example, I was born at the convergence of several close aspects: partile Jupiter-Uranus conjunction, partile Venus-Pluto square, and close platic Mercury-Saturn conjunction and Mars-Neptune square (among a stream of static aspects and last-minute Moon aspects). How did these converge in choices?

We find the universe, in the last half of 1954, formulating a Jupiter-Uranus conjunction that was partile September 27 to October 18. Let's start with the theory that, whatever I was supposed to represent, it would emerge in this time period. Most likely, what the universe was trying to express in me required a Virgo Sun, so we can shorten this slightly to Sep 27 to Oct 17.

Within that range, Mars squared Neptune within 3° Oct 12-16; Venus squared Pluto Oct 8-12; and Mercury conjoined Saturn Oct 3-11. Just by looking at the coexistence of these four aspects, we have a narrow window of Oct 8-11 as four days on which all of these few, close ideas could converge. (This is the window in which all three people we were talking about came into being.)

So, we have a major event of Jupiter conjunct Uranus partile, that is concurrently layered with Mars-Neptune, Venus-Pluto, and Mercury-Saturn. We can count on the fact hat, on these four days, the universe was busy exuding manifestations (especially people) who would embody the coexistence of these FOUR ideas.

Now... what narrows it from there?

From the start of October 8 until the end of October 11, Moon moved from 27° Capricorn to 25°Pisces. Only a Capricorn, Aquarius, or Pisces Moon was possible. Different categories of phenomena would have been produced depending on the Moon-sign selected. At least Bakula and I, and possibly Roth, manifests of an Aquarius Moon in the midst of this distinctive cluster of planet aspects. Understanding this choice helps me understand the particular way I'm distinguished from other people born in the four-day period. Narrowing this to an Aquarius Moon choice gives a birth bounded by October 8, 6:07 AM CST, to Oct 10, 8:27 AM.

The only real difference to narrow the time within this range is in Moon's aspects. Moon's only hard aspects while in Aquarius would have been to Venus-Pluto early in the time. Otherwise, it has softer aspects near the middle and end. In meditating on my distinctive nature, I have to note that the Virgo-Aquarius born with Jupiter-Uranus, Mars-Neptune, Venus-Pluto, and Mercury-Saturn did not choose to have Moon sear and scintillate that Venus-Pluto, nor to have it trine the Mercury-Saturn, nor to directly hit any of those major aspects; but, rather, chose the distinctive kind of passion and keenness of Moon sextile Mars, which was within three degrees October 10, 1:41 AM to 11:53 AM.

And then, within that, I chose to be born with an angular Moon. The only options during that time would have been Moon setting at 3:55 AM and Moon anticulminating at 10:04 AM. The latter would have put Mars exactly angular also, and significantly altered the tone of my character, so I was born near Moon's 3:55 AM setting, at 4:13 AM. (In case people think this is important, the first minute Virgo was rising was 4:02, and Gemini wasn't on MC until 4:06.)

This helps me understand what the universe was trying to decide in bringing me forth, i.e., who I am; and it helps show those things that Bakula, Roth, and I have in common, and those things that make us different people.
User avatar
TheScales_BothWays
Sidereal Field Agent
Sidereal Field Agent
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:42 am

Re: Who feels it more?

Post by TheScales_BothWays »

by TheScales_BothWays on Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:40 am

Well that question was mostly rhetorical, but thank you for answering it anyway!
Jim Eshelman wrote:This helps me understand what the universe was trying to decide in bringing me forth, i.e., who I am; and it helps show those things that Bakula, Roth, and I have in common, and those things that make us different people.
Indeed Jim, I can see that too!
Maybe I should do this thing for my birth too sometime! :mrgreen:
Post Reply