In reviewing a medical astrology thread, I was reminded that Venus Daily raised Mariah Carey as an example of certain things and I pointed out that there is a lot of uncertainty about her birth. I never followed up on that. Astro.com rates the birth data as B (biography), favoring a birth year different from what is usually given in the press. I thought I should follow up on this and give the full background - drawing on details aggregated by Astro.com.
These are the birth data most commonly cited by astrologers. However, they can't be correct. A newspaper article nearly one year earlier (The Long-Islander in Huntington, NY, page 3, "Recent Births Are Announced," April 10, 1969), stated:An anonymous source quotes an article in Rolling Stone magazine, 23 February 2006, for time of birth and date [1]: "When Patricia Carey gave birth to a seven-pound baby girl at 7:27 A.M. on March 27th, 1970, the nurse turned to her and said, "That's gonna be one lucky baby."
Therefore, the birth must have been 1969, not 1970.Recent births at Huntington Hospital have been announced as follows... March 27 Mariah, Mr. and Mrs. Alfred Carey, Huntington").
Reporters have tried to fine tune this with biographical details such as her age when she graduated high school, but it seems the newspaper report of her birth in 1969 is definitive by itself. (She and her mother have both been cagey about her age, with Mariah seeming to want to avoid the whole subject - a bigger deal when she was quite young, of course. One reporter found that her driver's license - a legal document with penalties for lying - had the 1969 date on it.)
So it's 1969.
The question remaining, then, is whether there is sufficient reason to think that the Rolling Stone article has a correct time (7:27 AM). I'm not ready to put confidence in that. Therefore, I don't think the time deserves a B rating (from 'biographical' sources) but, rather, a C rating for "no confirmation of source of the data."