SteveS wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 7:02 am
It’s easy to see with 20-20 hindsight SMA is displaying great natural laws with the Cardinal Ingresses, but we are left with WHERE they will manifest beforehand. For example: With DC’s 1871 Capsolar the partile Mars-Saturn 90
is not angular. This means that it is not foretelling a possible destruction principle. It’s not until we analyze DC’s 1871 Cansolar are we tipped-off that there is high % the USA will experience some malefic Moon-Saturn-Neptune incident for DC's Cansolar's quarter.
I think there are two things here: First, there IS a way to see where these are most likely to manifest, using astromaps of the ingresses. For this, the Capsolar did well in the sense that the Saturn rising and Mars square Ascendant lines strike through northern Wisconsin and it was the Peshtigo fire - not the Chicago fire - that was the biggest event. As loud and splashy as the Chicago fire is in history, it was a minor incident compared to the Peshtigo fire straight north, the deadliest fire in U.S. history (burning over a million acres and killing at least 1,500 people - maybe 2,500). The technique is: Find the malefic line on the map and allow 150-180 miles
either side of the line to estimate the 3° orb.
The other point is that the Capsolar, alone, doesn't catch every important event. It looks like you're trying to get the Capsolar to show everything important in the year, and it simply doesn't. It is so reliable (especially in describing the tone of a nation's capital for an entire year) that it's easy to forget that
no single chart shows everything important.
Here are some data points from Chapter 33 of the current edition of
SMA. For now, I'm ignoring the fine points of what happens when the Capsolar is dormant (since that's not the case with your example):
- The Capsolar, by itself, had a +1 score or higher 90% of the time. (That's good! Really good IMHO. But it's not 100%.)
- The Quarter solar ingress, by itself, had a +1 score or higher 89% of the time.
- Only the Capsolar remains strong for the entire year. Quarter charts are comparably strong in their own quarters. (This statement ignores dormancy considerations.)
Here's the really interesting thing that I think puts this in perspective: Of 501 events catalogued, BOTH the Capsolar and Quarter chart were dormant 59 times. That leaves 442 events to study. Of these 442 events, EITHER the Capsolar or the Quarter chart correctly showed the event all but four times. That's a 99.1% accuracy rate!
ONE OR THE OTHER showed it over 99% of the time. But they only BOTH showed the event 236 times (53%). On the other hand, individually the Capsolar and the Quarter charts are each accurate 89-90% of the time.
The important conclusion to draw from this is that it only takes one solar ingress - EITHER the Year chart or the Quarter chart - to show the event, and with only one of them the big events have been shown historically 99.1% of the time.
So - to summarize - I think the first response in your question is that you are looking at the wrong event: The Chicago fire was a sideshow, and the Peshtigo fire the main show - and the Peshtigo area was exactly identified in the Capsolar. The second response is that you can't rely on the Capsolar for everything (even though you can rely on it about 90% of the time). The Quarter chart is more or less equally important and has to be considered in the mix.
And then there is the third answer, the one you won't want to hear: Sometimes an event shows best ONLY for Washington and barely shows for the event locale at all. A big Arizona fire a few years back was
predicted from the DC charts, even though there was no clue where it would be. (Charts also showed for Arizona.) The Sandy Hook shooting was almost ENTIRELY a Washington event - a national event, not a local event - according to the charts, even though the same charts showed deep suffering and heartbreak at Sandy Hook for many months later in the year (which I think shows the emotions finally catching up with everybody and not letting go). This doesn't happen much, but it does happen now and again.
We immediately see with this DC Mundo Cansolar an “outstanding incident” angular partile Moon-Saturn 180 on DC’s Horizon squaring Neptune on the IC. We have been forewarned that there is high % a very malefic Moon-Saturn-Neptune principle will manifest sometime/somewhere in DC’s Cansolar quarter, but where in the USA? Correct me if I am wrong, but when we take DC’s eclipto Cansolar and go to Solar Maps looking for clues WHERE in the USA is under the most danger for the quarter of this DC Cansolar, we see the Cansolar Mars line going over Chicago, maybe a red flag for Chicago?
Yes - or, more exactly, the Chicago-Peshtigo line. (Really, if you look at both the Capsolar and Cansolar maps for the Peshtigo event, you'll be thrilled. Chicago is also shown [in the Cansolar], but Peshtigo is rightly picked by BOTH charts and their intersections.
BTW, with your events in the last half of the post, this is exactly the problem I've been mentioning for years. Despite all of today's computer resources, our computer resources are limited. We have to literally SET UP THE CHARTS for each individual location - the whole army of solar and lunar ingresses for EVERY location. The only way I see that we could catch things is if we had an army of astrologers (several in each state) that are tasked to keep an eye on their own location and report back what they find.
I do know what the program we need would look like. Nobody is going to build it in the near future, but I know what it would look like: As a MINIMUM, it would have astromapping that would let us overlap multiple charts. - At this point, we can't even get major angle crossings and squares to the angles on the same chart, can't get EP/WP at all, and certainly can't overlap multiple charts. Imagine, though, that you could overlap the Capsolar and Cansolar lines on one map (including ALL angles): It would precisely define Peshtigo, Wisconsin and, less precisely, Chicago.
A better program have colored bands fading out 3° either side of the planet lines so that we could see
regions gradually isolated as we added one chart on top of another. A third feature would be colored zones where Moon's mundane aspects existed (which are geographically bounded).
With this, we could truly zero in on the most afflicted areas with a whole series of Year, Quarter, Month, Week, and even Day charts. Without this.. without at least being able to overlay multiple charts on the same astromaps (say, showing only the Mars and Saturn lines and seeing where they accumulate as new layers are added), we are at a great disadvantage.
Jim I have a glaring question in my mind: Is it fair to say for any DC Capsolar, when we see a partile Mars 0,90,180 aspect with either Saturn, Uranus, Neptune or Pluto, even if not angular; and, then see a very malefic angular constructed DC quarter chart following a non-angular partile Mars aspected DC Capsolar, we immediately should start isolating the danger zones in USA with any possible SMA malefic Quarter Chart where the above partile Mars aspects fall angular in the cities Capsolar (their master charts of their year)?
Maybe. Probably with a high percentage of the time. We've done this in a limited way, but not systematically or always reliably.
It's hard to track because we don't get news from everywhere. I could predict that X would happen a bit west of Denver and, unless someone monitors the Denver area news for a month, we might never know about it. The event might be really important to the people there, but not outside that area, for example.
A gap in the SMA research is that I haven't studied EVERY SINGLE LOCAL EVENT for Washington, DC. We don't have a list of things that appeared for Washington AND locally. That would be another year of work and I'm sure that I personally won't have time for at least three years (since The Big Book gets all my available time until it's done). My best answer so far is that to know what is going to happen at a particular place, somebody has to sit down and study that particular place and keep an eye on it. (I don't even do that for my own city.)
BTW, in your question you presume that the same planet would show in both places. That's not likely the case. When a national-interest big event occurs somewhere outside of Washington, the event means one thing where it occurs, while in Washington the main concern is how to deal with that event (somewhere else). Things like the Chicago fire and Sn Francisco earthquake show in Washington as negative economy and market impact, but events like the Exxon Valdez incident or Columbine shootings show up in DC
mostly as "we have to go into crisis mode." The most reliable marker in a DC chart for a crisis
somewhere else is Pluto on the angles: You'll see in my published interpretations that this often means having to deal with something
somewhere else. In DC, they are more interested in economic impact, political impact, mobilizing recovery efforts - a very different tone than exists at the actual location.
I tried to break down your question in the last paragraph and I don't understand the exact situation you are asking about. I couldn't beak it out into exact criteria that would allow me to calculate an answer for you.
If you want to study events for the U.S. that were local disasters or likely national impact - and compare Washington and local charts - here is a list of those I would recommend that are catalogued in the latest
SMA version:
- Earthquakes (Ch 10): San Francisco, Northridge
- Hurricanes (Ch 13): Unfortunately, these are mostly East Coast so the charts for DC would be similar. Any of them could be studied, though, since the latitude of Florida is quite a bit different. But off the East Coast band and of enormous national impact are Galveston, the 1916 Texas Hurricane, and Katrina in particular.
- Floods (Ch 14): Most of them that occurred in the U.S.
- Tornadoes (Ch 15): These were always hard to study because they spread over such large areas. It might be interesting to re-examine all the U.S. ones for Washington to see if the national charts showed them better than or equal to the local charts.
- Fires (Ch 16): Draw your own conclusions on what was of national importance or big enough, but a few that seem obvious to me are the Conway Theater, Hartford Circus, Great Chicago Fire, Great Spokane Fire, Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, Ohio State Penitentiary, Peshtigo Fire, Great Fire of 1910, Yarnell Hills (that showed in DC I know).
- Bombs (Ch 17): 10th Street Baptist Church, Oklahoma City, Austin serial bombs.
- Explosions (Ch 19): Texas City disaster, South Amboy explosions, New London school explosion, Three Mile Island, and others.
- Deaths of Leaders (Ch 21): These are mostly DC-linked, but you can also check from this chapter the Martin Luther King Jr., Robert Kennedy, George Moscone and Harvey Milk.
- Uprisings (Ch 24): Ludlow massacre, Selma "Bloody Sunday" march, Watts riots, Stonewall riots, Wounded Knee occupation, CSA siege, 1992 LA riots, Waco Siege.
- Mass Murders (Ch 25): Many of these have had profound national impact, which you can sort out as well as I. Several obvious ones.