Mozart

[Jim Eshelman]

Mozart AA rated: 1/27/1756 8:00 PM Salzburg, Austria

Austrian composer who wrote masterpieces in every branch of classical music, regarded as one of the world's great geniuses. He came into the world endowed with native talent in which there is no equal in the history of music, a prolific child prodigy,

There is no doubt Uranus confered this great genius by being partile cnj Mozart’s Dsc, Eclipto & Mundo. Uranus is par-exvellent symbolism for any types of “original inventive abilities.”

In later life he suffered from paranoia, fearing that he was going to be poisoned by an unknown enemy. Unable to regulate his spending, his financial affairs were chaotic.

We can see this trait in Mozart with his partile cnj of Sun-Mercury oppose Neptune.

Note his partile Moon-Pluto cnj, Ebertin says about this combo:

Principle: An extremely emotional life or an extreme expression of feeling.
Probable Manifestations: The pursuit of selected objectives with fanatical zeal and with subsequent attainment without any regard for other people.

We can certainly see this potent Moon-Pluto aspect "emotionally" expressed through his great music he brought to this world. Whenever we see Pluto wired in to prominent aspects we have to allow for "stunning/shocking" manifestations. Note this Moon-Pluto cnj is partile 60 Jupiter for his great musical success.

http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Mozart

[Jim Eshelman]

I see sun,mercury,neptune as the musical genius and pluto,jupiter as the success part.

Uranus and Pluto for the genius. Capricorn-Scorpio for music, surely Neptune adding to his fluidity, surrealism, and drama plus the Capricorn-Scorpio interest in esoteric themes etc.

Mercury isn't genius. In fact, it tends to stay with the data. It's intellect rather than intelligence. It can be quick, it can be efficient, but, by itself, it doesn't launch out of the existing framework.

Jupiter... there really isn't much of note. It does sextile the Moon-Pluto, so there is a benevolent cast to the Moon-Pluto, but that's not a dynamic aspect. I think his "success" was a consequence of his quality and novelty (and, sure, his early death). He was the Michael Jackson of his day.

[Jim Eshelman]

Navamsa Moon in Aquarius, or Novien Moon in Gemini. Does anyone think one or the other signs decisively, strikingly describes him? (Testing, by subjective assessment, the two secondary Moon-sign theories.)

For myself, I leap immediately to the Aquarius... but I could be biased on that