Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Q&A and discussion on Solar Arc Directions.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

I hear you Jim and understand where you are coming from. All I know for sure are angular Solar Arc partile hits are timing major “Life Developments” in our lives, some involving major outer planet transits--some are not. I am only presenting all the charts involved with partile aspects, probably the law of averages will not fit the symbolism with a few of the partile. I am doing this Clifford exercise with Transits to Natal & Solar Arc factors and other non-angular Solar Arc hits to Natals to get my own personal feel for Clifford’s reserched work in his Solar Arc book, only with partile aspects. I am sure we will each have our different opinions, in most cases I never see two astrologers agreeing on everything from a book. But, I do agree with you we are seeing some (only a few) of these partile aspects not fitting the symbolism for major “Life Development”, but we must remember, we are not living these actual events, only the native is living these major “Life Developments.” But, who are we to judge what partile aspects/symbolism fitted an individual major “Life Development” for the Native? Only with an astrologer asking the native about their major “Life Developments” can we actually determine what the native experienced with various partile aspects, and/or what they didn’t experience. Major Life Events can come with different mixtures of experiences/symbolism. I will reserve my final conclusion when my research exercise is finished with Clifford's Solar Arc examples. So few books have been well researched with Solar Arcs, but we do know they work with angular hits.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

“A five year divorce battle” (Mel Gibson)

Post by SteveS »

Mel Gibson found stability and structure through his religious 28-year marriage. But when Solar Arc Mars conjunct his Natal DSC, he made some anti-Semitic remarks while being arrested for DUI. This led to much negative publicity and, due to drinking, he and his wife separated the following day on July 29 2006. It began a five-year divorce battle (Mars) which would be one of the costliest in Hollywood history. By transit, Saturn was 180 his Natal Venus, and transiting Pluto was 90 his Natal MC/IC axis.
The major angular Solar Arc “Life Development” which began this 5 year divorce War (Mars) for Mel:
Solar Arc Mars 20,31 Sag partile conjunct his Natal DSC 20,51 Sag; 20 minutes approaching orb.

Partile Transits:
Transiting Saturn 18,53 Cancer partile 180 his Natal Venus 19,00 Cap; 7 minutes approaching orb.

Transiting Pluto 29,35 Scorpio partile 90 his Natal MC-IC axis 00,13 Pisces-Virgo; 38 minutes approaching.

Interesting inner planet transits:
t Mercury partile 180 his Solar Arc Saturn
Transiting Mars partile 180 his Solar Arc Sun
Birth Data: 1/3/1956 at 16:45 EST in Peekskill, New York, USA (41N17, 73W55)
Data Source: Newspaper announcement, as quoted in the biography Mel: The Inside Story by Wensley Clarkson; copy on file.
Shakespeare may have been an Astrologer understanding the Planets in the Solar System with their precise mathematical/geometry arranges the timing order of our Major “Life Developments” for when Skakespeare used the word “ALL” in his following famous phase:
“All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.”
Mel’s Natal Chart (inner wheel); Solar Arcs to July 29, 2006 when his wife left him forever (middle wheel); Transits on July 29,2006 (outer wheel)

https://ibb.co/8458kbF
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

I will eventually post the rest of Clifford’s 40 Solar Arc examples. But FWIW I have already come to one main new astrological conclusion:

Outer planet partile 0 90 180 aspects to Solar Arc angles are important with AA charts. They will be part of my main tool box. My research with this thread confirms to me Noel Tyl's and to a certain extent with Charles Carter's writting about the importance of these 0 90 180 partile outer planet aspects with directions. This only allows for a possible forecast/sight for around a six month period before and after exact aspect. Solunars are still my best forecasting tool in my handbag for certain narrower time frames. :)
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by Jim Eshelman »

FWIW, I'm still extremely skeptical of the reality of transits to solar arc points (excluding Sun, since that is progressed Sun as well).
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

I understand Jim--no big deal. I am just going my what my mind is proving with my own personal research using common sense with: if our Natal Angles are of extreme importance with outer planet transits---WHY not for our Solar Arc angles as well? Our Solar Arc charts are a natural mathematical directed personal individual extension of our Natals (selves) into the future. We already know for sure our Solar Arc angles directed to 0 90 180 with our Natal Planets are very important timing indicators. I am just researching what a couple of other autors have said what their research have said with outer planet transits to Solar Arc factors and closely looked at their examples along with some other examples with my personal chart files, and IMO they are proved-out correct in my mind. Just offering my conclusion on somethings which I have read but wanted to do more research.
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by Jim Eshelman »

SteveS wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:44 am if our Natal Angles are of extreme importance with outer planet transits---WHY not for our Solar Arc angles as well?
I can only give a theoretical answer, of course: I don't think solar arc positions are "real" positions. I think we're seeing effects of midpoint constructs that are easiest to track by plotting them as solar arc directions.

I'll start watching them day to day with next month's daily transit sheets, though, so see if they are responsive to transits. One reason I think they won't be is that, over the years, I finally had to give up on tracking transits to "primary" angles - whether calculated by Naibod rate or Solar Arc rate. That means I've already ruled out (buy their utter day-to-day failure) transits to Solar Arc MC. Solar Arc angles to natal planets obviously work, and Primary angles to natal and progressed planets demonstrably work, but transits (at least to the primary angles) simply do not.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

OK Jim, we disagree, not sure we are on the same page as how we each are guaging em. I think they do work relative to how I see em working, but they would defintely be "once in lifetime" transits, and I doubt I will live long enough to see another :), but if I do I will defintely post. :)
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by Jim Eshelman »

If transits to solar arc positions work, then all transiting planet conjunctions, oppositions, and squares (at least) to AT LEAST the directed angles and luminaries (if not all planets) should work in a day-to-day fashion. When transiting Mars conjoins my Solar Arc Ascendant October 26, it should be a day matching what we see with transiting Mars crossing my natal Ascendant, etc.

Next month, I have seven transiting conjunctions, oppositions, or squares to directed Sun, Moon, Ascendant, or Midheaven. One of these is Jupiter opposite directed Ascendant November 8. Another is directed Mars opposite directed Moon November 26. I've already made a note so that when I calculate my daily transits for November, I'll include transits to all solar arc planets and watch them for a month or two, but I've just listed two that we can all watch. (I do already know that the Jupiter transit is the day after Marion is expected to have her weight-bearing restrictions lifted.)

I know they haven't stood out for past major events, so I'm returning (to give them another chance) to the one thing that most reliably tests predictive methods: Watching ordinary day-to-day occurrences, psychological states, etc.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

Jim wrote:
I've already made a note so that when I calculate my daily transits for November, I'll include transits to all solar arc planets and watch them for a month or two,...
Jim, this is defintely not where I am coming from ("daily transits") with the way I am looking at the major outer planet transits to Solar Arc factors for a major event (Life Development). I am only looking for partile outer planet transits to Solar Arc factors possibly coinciding with major new "Life Developments" for the day of the event. The only daily non outer planet transits that I have seen which really arouse my curiosity in a WOW way is transiting Sun to Solar ARC Sun (progressed Sun) and a few with the inner transiting planets, but please understand---only for the few really big life events on the day they manifest. For example here is the most benefic event in my entire life involving my Natal, Solar Arcs, and transits to the exact day of the main event:

https://ibb.co/FDW25rJ

Inner wheel Natal; middle wheel Solar Arcs; outer wheel transits. On Oct 30 1987; 10:00 AM (if memory is serving me), I fullfilled my dream of leagally becoming the owner of my own Theater.

t Sun partile cnj d Sun
t Ve partile cnj d Me partile cnj r Jup
t Ma partile 90 d EP/ED (long story on main event day)
t Mo partile 180 r Sat (long story on main event day)
t Ur partile 90 d Pl
The main "Life Developments":
d MC partile cnj r Nep
d Asc partile 90 r Ve

What has to happen IMHO is a one clear day main major event has to happen to trigger the sight of partile transits to solar arc factors which have been laying dormant. This example does not have an outer planet transit to d angles but I have seen cases of this same type transits. Some cases d angular hits have no transits involved but when they do have partile transits it adds much richer symbolism.
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by Jim Eshelman »

SteveS wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:21 pm Jim, this is defintely not where I am coming from ("daily transits") with the way I am looking at the major outer planet transits to Solar Arc factors for a major event (Life Development).
I know it's not. But I've already found the idea to fail miserably in major life events for myself and others I've checked. Yes, there is an occasional random hit well below even average expectation (and usually not that). So I have no reason to place any confidence in it as a timer of major events at all.

I either settle into "nothing here, go back to ignoring it" or I give it one last chance. The bottom line question seems simple: Are solar arc positions responsive to transits? If so, I'll give them a way to prove it.

I'm not optimistic.
The only daily non outer planet transits that I have seen which really arouse my curiosity in a WOW way is transiting Sun to Solar ARC Sun (progressed Sun) and a few with the inner transiting planets, but please understand---only for the few really big life events on the day they manifest
I see them all the time. Almost every day. Yesterday, transiting Sun and Mercury conjoined my natal Neptune: A birthday present Marion bought me that should have been here weeks ago finally showed up, a custom blended Bourbon. I had to go across town (to my office) to pick it up and had various transportation confusions along the way, but got home fine. After dinner, we then sampled the Bourbon, got half-snockered, and otherwise had a fun, indulgent evening. - It's as perfect a Mercury and Sun opposite natal Neptune as could be.

Today, transiting Mercury squared my SSR Pluto. Stress was a little high, feeling a bit confrontation, then was asked to investigate bizarre misbehavior in the network path of our Shanghai office (something I couldn't ordinarily do). Tomorrow, Mercury will square my Jupiter-Uranus and I expect things to be much brighter, and particularly good for getting the chapter on midpoints finished (I'm close). Monday was my work hire anniversary so they gave me a free day off that I enjoyed immensely (writing during the day and having a better than usual dinner): transiting Venus conjoined my SSR Moon. Tuesday was back to work after several days off, having to get up an hour and a half earlier and push hard through the day: transiting Sun squared my Mars, which usually means for me pushing too hard and feeling burned out. - And so on, day by day (most days).
For example here is the most benefic event in my entire life involving my Natal, Solar Arcs, and transits to the exact day of the main event... I fullfilled my dream of leagally becoming the owner of my own Theater.

t Sun partile cnj d Sun
t Ve partile cnj d Me partile cnj r Jup
t Ma partile 90 d EP/ED (long story on main event day)
t Mo partile 180 r Sat (long story on main event day)
t Ur partile 90 d Pl
The main "Life Developments":
d MC partile cnj r Nep
d Asc partile 90 r Ve
The directions of MC to natal Neptune and Ascendant to natal Venus are solid. We know solar arcs work, especially from personal points.

There are problems with some of the others, though, so let's whittle it down a bit: You can't use directed Sun in any of these tests because this is the same as progressed Sun - and we already have strong statistics that transits to progressed Sun and Moon are powerful. (Even if that's backwards and it was always SA Sun, it's too confusing to use it.)

You can't use t Mars square d EP-a. First, squares to EP-a are invalid. Second, you can't direct that angle - it's a fictitious point approximating where a Right Ascension conjunction would occur.

There is a very interesting one which is the scenario I brought up at the beginning: Directed Mercury conjoins natal Jupiter - great aspect, perfect for the event and only 7' wide. Then we get the confusing one: Transiting Venus conjoins the d Mercury and r Jupiter. I entirely accept t Venus conjunct natal Jupiter for the event. But there is no way to even assess whether t Venus to d Mercury is valid because of the Mercury-Jupiter direction. Is this really t Venus conjunct d Mercury? Or is it only that d Mercury and r Venus concurrently conjoined natal Jupiter? I think it's the latter, you think it's the former, and my main point is that we just can't tell - we have to leave this sort of "doubled up" hit out of the research because there is no logical way to assess it.

So there are three clear, descriptive directions, a Venus transit to your Jupiter, Sun conjunct your progressed Sun, and several aspects we can't use for the assessment.

That leaves only t Uranus square d Pluto. (That is the only transit to a solar arc planet that exists on its own in that long list of aspects.) I can see how this would fit - this was a big "this changes everything" event - but it's only one aspect. Worth noting, of course.
What has to happen IMHO is a one clear day main major event has to happen to trigger the sight of partile transits to solar arc factors which have been laying dormant.
If I'm understanding you correctly, you're saying that transits to solar arc planets are valid, but they are only valid for major events, not for ordinary events. Is that the rule to be tested?
This example does not have an outer planet transit to d angles but I have seen cases of this same type transits. Some cases d angular hits have no transits involved but when they do have partile transits it adds much richer symbolism.
BTW, I think you said that secondary progressions had never worked well for you. For this most benefic day of your life, your progressed Venus was 27°26' Libra, 28' from conjunct your Ascendant. Progressed Saturn, though had reached the same place - I'm not sure what that means and, while you seem to be describing a once-in-a-lifetime Venus event I do not think you are describing a Venus-Saturn event. So I'm not sure that's a good hit. Here are the progressions:

27°27' Lib - p Venus
27°34' Can - p Saturn
27°55' Lib - r Asc

But where the progressions really did come through is the stunning occurrence of your SNQ MC for Springville at 29°52' Libra conjunct natal Jupiter within minutes - with transiting Venus conjunct it:

29°42' Lib - r Jupiter
29°52' Lib - p MC
0°05' Sco - t Venus

It was the happy transit of the day!
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

Jim asked:
If I'm understanding you correctly, you're saying that transits to solar arc planets are valid, but they are only valid for major events, not for ordinary events. Is that the rule to be tested?
Exactly Jim! I would be exactly like you Jim--I would never pay any attention to these transits for ordinary day living, but defintely would when I knew for sure circumstances were happening for possible new major "Life Developments." What I am saying is that my research into Noel’s and Carter’s writings about the importance of the major outer planet transits 0 90 180 pertaining to Solar Arc directions are important to read as valid symbolism for major new “Life Developments”. For example: An astrologer who believes in the importance of angular Solar Arc hits (0 90 180) would have looked at my chart for the partile aspected time frame (months) and said something like this: There is going to be a major Life Development occur in your life and it will be “revolutionary” because the astrologer was reading t Ur partile 90 to my d Pluto. For sure Oct 30 1980 was the single most “revolutionary” event to ever happen in my life. It was a big part of the stage play I was acting in my life at that time.
But here is something new that I am learning/realizing as a fair possibility: When an astrologer is seeing/reading possible major “Life Developments” with angular Solar Arc hits within a few months of time frame, it could be that t Sun partile 0 90 180 to Solar Arc Sun or Progressed Sun—the same, could be forecasting the exact day of the major new "Life Development" to manifest, particularly with the 0 aspect.
When we astrologers are doing research with major new “Life Development” angular Solar Arc hits with book examples from other authors, that author never knows when or if there was an exact day the new “Life Development” manifested as an exact day for a major event. Being an astrologer I have always been keenly interested in astrological symbolism for exact day events and it makes good common sense to me that t Sun would be the best to go to for the final trigger.
Jim wrote:
BTW, I think you said that secondary progressions had never worked well for you. For this most benefic day of your life, your progressed Venus was 27°26' Libra, 28' from conjunct your Ascendant. Progressed Saturn, though had reached the same place - I'm not sure what that means and, while you seem to be describing a once-in-a-lifetime Venus event I do not think you are describing a Venus-Saturn event. So I'm not sure that's a good hit. Here are the progressions:
27°27' Lib - p Venus
27°34' Can - p Saturn
27°55' Lib - r Asc
But where the progressions really did come through is the stunning occurrence of your SNQ MC for Springville at 29°52' Libra conjunct natal Jupiter within minutes - with transiting Venus conjunct it:
29°42' Lib - r Jupiter
29°52' Lib - p MC
0°05' Sco - t Venus
Outstanding observations Jim, thanks for this. And for sure the Venus-Saturn symbolism was part of this grand stage play “Life Development” in my life. This is a good example of what I have been trying to say: Most of the time when we astrologers are reading other people’s charts with our methods, we simply don't kanow exactly what is going on in their immediate environments to eventually produce the final event for a new major “Life Development.” I had to go through a tremendous amount of malefic pain to free myself for my new benefic “Life Development” to manifest on Oct 30 1987 (no pain-no gain). In many cases “we have to fight for our freedom” to quote a passage from an old Tom Petty song. Thanks Jim, your input always have allowed me to see/understand better what I am trying to understand and post about. :)
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

I have been posting in this tread many Solar Arc examples from Frank C Clifford’s book “The Solar Arc Handbook.” Being a Virgo and having much affinity with Mercury, I love learning new truths for my astrological tool box, and I have a current SSR which is opening my mind to new astrological truths for me, IMHO.

When I first read Clifford’s book, he introduced me to the importance of factoring in outer planet transits to Solar Arc factors, particularly when we sense/know important new “Life Developments” are occurring in our lives. Both Noel Tyl and Charles Carter were great advocates for outer planet transits in various ways with angular Solar Arc hits-- directions/progressions. That’s what I find so great about angular Solar Arc hits---they indeed signal new “Life Developments” unfolding with our destiny/lives and I started this thread to help everyone who may be interested to maybe better understand the outer planet transit symbolism that may be happening simultaneously with an angular Solar Arc hit—0 90 180. Every astrologer will have to decide for themselves the worth of what I write in this thread.

As I have stated, Clifford’s book has made a believer out of me with his book examples about outer planet transits to Solar Arc factors particularly when angular Solar Arc hits are happening. However, I just discovered a sterling example confirming Clifford’s work for me, but not a Clifford example, that has just occurred very recently with a well know person as a great songwriter and activist for just causes; but, she has recently been busted big time for projecting a public image that now has been proven a glaring falsehood. I can clearly see in her Natal WHY/HOW she projected this public falsehood which I will get into before a look at her Solar Arcs and outer planet transits.

Her name: Buffy Sainte Marie. Birth data: 2/20/1941; 3:15 AM; Stoneham, Massachusetts; 42N28,48; 071W06. AA
Indigenous scholars like Kim TallBear, a professor of Native studies at the University of Alberta in Edmonton and a member of Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate, say it’s unacceptable for non-Indigenous people to speak for Indigenous people and take honours set aside for them.
“It’s theft of opportunities, resources. It’s theft of our stories,” she said.
For many years, Sainte-Marie claimed she was born on the Piapot First Nation near Regina.


Bio: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffy_Sainte-Marie

More later...
Last edited by SteveS on Tue Oct 31, 2023 5:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Buffy Sainte-Marie

Post by SteveS »

Oct 28 2023
CBC newsmagazine The Fifth Estate has aired its Buffy Sainte-Marie exposé. The hourlong documentary episode, presented by senior investigative reporter Geoff Leo, alleges that the singer-songwriter — considered the first Indigenous winner of an Academy Award — has been fraudulently posing as Native throughout her 60-year career.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv ... 235630691/

This situation with Buffy is a most bizarre Life Development for her and when I first read about it I thought Neptune is dominating her life, also maybe Pluto, and indeed this was the case when I got into her Solar Arcs. This is the first time in my life I have seen a native busted by an investigated media source producing an AA birth certificate on a famous public figure perpetuating a falsehood. So, I thought I would do some investigated work myself with my astrological tool bag. Since I can’t investigate my main go-to Sidereal Return Charts by not knowing where Buffy was located, I always go to Solar Arcs because we compute from birth place. My Solar Arc investigation revealed some very interesting results, but first I needed to look at her Natal Chart to see if I could understand WHY Buffy would want to perpetuate this falsehood about her heritage? I don’t know for sure if I found the absolute answer to this WHY, but I did find something very interesting using my astrological tool bag.

First we immediately see with her Natal a Class 1 conjunction of her Mars to her ASC. For sure, by reading her Bio the lesser malefic of Mars has roughed her-up in her life, 3 divorces (I think), with one of the ex’s physically abusing her. But, since I use the Node a-lot from my astrological tool bag, what I immediately noticed was the “outstanding incident” of an angular Mars partile 90 her Node, with a tight foreground direct midpoint Node/Neptune = Zenith, partile. For sure, herein lies the life falsehood (Neptune) Buffy perpetuated to her public. But even more interesting for me is when I go to Ebertin’s COSI and read about her “outstanding incident” Mars-Node partile 90, the clear aspect signature of her Natal. Ebertin offers as tones for this combo:
Collaboration and cooperation with unions. Desire to cooperate with others, comradeship and team spirit, a social conscience, desire for progeny.
Bingo! The key words above for her Mars-Node “outstanding” life “incident” is:
…desire for progeny.
Progeny definition:
A descendant or the descendants of a person.
And since her Node calculates a direct foreground midpoint of Node/Neptune = Zenith, for some unknown reason Buffy perpetuated a Neptunian falsehood of being a direct “descendant” from the Indian Cree Nation in Canada. Lyse, since you are from Canada I am sure the news media up there is full of this glamorous news story with Buffy. What have you read in the news for the speculative reasons Buffy perpetuated this complete Neptunian Falsehood? Lyse, do you know where she happened to be located for her current SSR?

Next her Solar Arcs which exactly timed to the year when this huge falsehood in her life would be exposed.
Lyse
Constellation Member
Constellation Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:14 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by Lyse »

Lyse, since you are from Canada I am sure the news media up there is full of this glamorous news story with Buffy.
Steve, there is a lot of shock here as she was a hero and especially to the native community. Now, a few are speaking up and wanting her stripped of the many honorary awards she received.

If you’re interested, the documentary is available on YouTube. ‘Investigating Buffy Saint-Marie’s claims to Indigenous Ancestry - The Fifth Estate’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMsqCWNCUc4
Lyse, do you know where she happened to be located for her current SSR?
She has lived on her farm in Kauai, Hawaii for decades, and now retired with health issues. She was most likely there for her 2023 SR but I’m not 100% sure.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

Thanks Lyse :) , I will definitely give the youtube a looks-see, and for sure will look at here current SSR today for Hawaii.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

Lyse, I feel so sad & sorry for what is happening to Buffy now in her life. By what I can tell, even if falsely presenting herself as a Cree, she did great things for the Cree Nation, yes?
Lyse
Constellation Member
Constellation Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:14 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by Lyse »

she did great things for the Cree Nation, yes?
Yes, she did and worked tirelessly for the community gaining deserved recognition for indigenous peoples and their struggles. It makes this story that much sadder. Buffy was beloved.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

I did not know Buffy's work that well but figured you would living in Canada. Thanks Lyse :)
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

OK, after many distractions this week I now want to get into Buffy’s Solar Arcs with outer planet transits showing how t Neptune partile cnj her Solar Arc Mars nailed (timed) Buffy’s lifelong adult falsehood of proclaiming herself a direct descendant of the Indian Cree Nation in Canada. Lyse earlier this week posted an excellent youtube link documenting exactly how Buffy’s lifelong falsehood of being born a Cree Indian was exposed and proven by professionals producing her Birth Certificate. It appears Buffy initiated this falsehood to enhance her career as a songwriter/singer/musician. The Cree Nation is thoroughly insulted and maddened by Buffy’s pretentious falsehood using the Cree Nation to enhance her career.
But first I want everyone to clearly see (link below) Buffy’s Natal Signature which I have already explained with Ebertin’s book “Combinations of Stellar Influences” were the planetary combo that appears to be responsible for Buffy’s lie of being born into the Cree Nation. As this angular Natal Signature directed itself by Solar Arc to the present day it ran into a partile conjunction with her d Natal Mars to t Neptune, exposing her lifelong adult falsehood. “Karma is a Bitch” or “Character is Destiny” if applied to what has now happened in Buffy’s life.

Only Buffy’s Natal Mars partile 90 Node cnj Neptune in below link:
https://ibb.co/wdCwbYB

Now let’s look a tri-wheel with Buffy’s Oct 28 (the day this news story broke) Solar Arcs (middle wheel) with her Natal (inner wheel) and transits (outer wheel):
https://ibb.co/SRBvjL0

Look at the outer wheel and note t Neptune partile cnj her Solar Arc Mars middle wheel the Natal Arm of her angular Natal Mars-Node-Neptune signature. Is there a major angular “Life Development” happening in her life? There sure is and its “stunning/shocking Solar Arc Pluto partile cnj her Natal MC, indeed a major “Life Pluto Transformation Development.”

Other notables:
Solar Arc Sun partile cnj her Natal Uranus (probably symbolizing a major "unexpected upset" for her life.)
Partile transiting Mars 180 Jupiter sitting partile on her partile Natal Jupiter-Saturn cnj.

Her current SSR for Hawaii shows malefic symbolism as well but more so probably with her poor health. What a terrible time for this falsehood to be exposed in her life.
Lyse
Constellation Member
Constellation Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2022 8:14 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by Lyse »

Is there a major angular “Life Development” happening in her life? There sure is and its “stunning/shocking Solar Arc Pluto partile cnj her Natal MC, indeed a major “Life Pluto Transformation Development.”
Steve, excellent symbolism for her fall from grace.

More fallout within the indigenous community and now, multiple demands for her awards to be revoked, ASAP.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Charles Carter's prognostication method?

Post by SteveS »

Yes, it’s a complete disgrace for Buffy, but I don’t blame the indigenous community. One of the most interesting analysis I have ran across, mainly because her true Birth Certificate was the one thing that busted her. Thanks again Lyse for posting the youtube link—very enlightening.
SteveS
Nabu
Posts: 6468
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Buffy's Career is launched Jan 29 1983

Post by SteveS »

Only when we know an important particular day is schedule on the calendar in our life, or when a particular day happens to manifest an important day in your life—check your transits to Solar Arc factors, particularly outer planet transits.

Here is a great example with Buffy’s Solar Arc MC on Jan 29 1983 when she and another co-writer won the Golden Globe award for Best Original Song—“Up Where We belong,” from the movie “An Officer and a Gentleman.” Also won the Academy Award for Best Song. These two prestigious awards launched Buffy’s career as a songwriter. BTW, a great song and movie.

Jan 29 1983 for Buffy:
Solar Arc MC 12,13 Scorpio
Transiting Jup 11,43 Scorpio partile cnj her d MC
Transiting Uranus 13,46 Scorpio
Ebertin's COSI “Thank You Lord" combo for a tight foreground t Jup/Ur = d MC (0,03)
Post Reply