Primary Directions

General Discussion on Progression or Direction matters for which a specific forum does not exist
Post Reply
User avatar
Freya
Zodiac Member
Zodiac Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 7:44 am

Primary Directions

Post by Freya »

Oct 05, 2012
How do primary directions rate in terms of accuracy? Are they worth looking into or should I stick to Secondary Progressions and Solar Arc?
User avatar
Freya
Zodiac Member
Zodiac Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 7:44 am

Re: Primary Directions

Post by Freya »

Jim Eshelman wrote:
Freya wrote:How do primary directions rate in terms of accuracy? Are they worth looking into or should I stick to Secondary Progressions and Solar Arc?
I'm sure I answered this question recently here. It was a nuanced answer that I don't have time to recreate in the next several days. Could you please look for my prior response first?

Ah, wait, here it is: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=354&p=2291&hilit=p ... ions#p2291
Mod Note: the link is fixed; to find Jim's writing on Primary Directions, scroll to the second post in the linked thread, and find the third quote in that post.
User avatar
Freya
Zodiac Member
Zodiac Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 7:44 am

Re: Primary Directions

Post by Freya »

thanks Jim, I went through the posts and I found this quote from you
If you mean the whole spherical mundane quasi-semi-arc rotational method normal considered for this, then I find them useless.
that's the method advocated in Christian Astrology by Lilly, isn't it?
User avatar
Freya
Zodiac Member
Zodiac Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 7:44 am

Re: Primary Directions

Post by Freya »

Jim Eshelman wrote:Yes.
Post Reply