From Who Was Who 1897-1915, Gleadow extracted 478 politicians.
Normalizing these against all entries in that volume, we get a disappointing overall score and the only significant result being a minor low in Sagittarius (< .10).
Correcting them only for astronomical factors, we get stronger results. Virgo peaks (almost .03), with Aquarius barely past the minor .10 mark. Sagittarius is significantly low (< .03). The overall score is not what we would like for a fully significant study.
Politicians
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19068
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Return to “Constellations Studies”
Jump to
- Discussion
- ↳ "Many Things"
- ↳ Software
- ↳ Time Matters
- ↳ Wish List file room
- ↳ How to use Time Matters
- ↳ Solar Fire tips
- ↳ Publications
- Natal Astrology
- ↳ Misc. on Natal Astrology
- ↳ Medical Astrology
- ↳ Discuss Your Own Horoscope
- ↳ The Planets
- ↳ The Constellations - Interpretations
- ↳ Fagan, Bradley & Gleadow on signs
- ↳ The Constellations - Discussion
- ↳ Constellations Studies
- ↳ Angles & Angularity
- ↳ Aspects
- ↳ The Novien
- ↳ Horoscopes of Interest
- ↳ 1,000+ Study Charts
- Solar & Lunar Returns
- ↳ Transits
- ↳ Misc. on Solunar Returns
- ↳ Solar & Lunar Returns - Interpretations
- ↳ Sidereal Solar Returns
- ↳ Sidereal Lunar Returns
- ↳ Solar Return Progressions
- Progressions & Directions
- ↳ Misc. on Progressions & Directions
- ↳ Secondary Progressions
- ↳ Quotidians
- ↳ Solar Arc Directions
- ↳ Tertiary Progressions
- Synastry
- ↳ Synastry Teachings & Resources
- ↳ Synastry Examples of the Famous
- ↳ Composite Charts
- Mundane Astrology
- ↳ Misc. on Mundane Astrology
- ↳ Reports & Studies
- ↳ Mundane Forecasts
- ↳ Trump Admin archives (2017-20)
- ↳ Biden Admin archives (2021-...)
- ↳ Mundane Events
- ↳ Recent Major Events
- ↳ Sidereal Solar & Lunar Ingresses & Quotidians
- ↳ Major Planet Sign Transits
- ↳ Outer Planet Current Aspects
- ↳ Sports Astrology