DYNAMIC SSR'S/'OUTSTANDING INCIDENTS'
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 9:50 pm
by SteveS on Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:40 pm
I took the following 3 criteria’s from Jim’s book, ‘Interpreting Solar Returns’ that has been the ONLY teaching tool I have discovered for isolating Solar Returns that have very high probability of producing ‘outstanding incidents’ in the life of a person. These 3 criteria’s never cease to amaze me as outstanding teaching points for Sidereal Astrology, associated with the Sidereal Solar Return (SSR). Cyril Fagan (the father of Sidereal Astrology) rediscovered by rigorous pursuit of historical evidence the profound astrological/astronomical truths of a SSR but for the most part-- these truths have been and continue to be ignored by the majority of the astrological community. I’ve come to believe Sidereal Astrology will only be pursued and learned by the ‘dedicated few’ who take up the serious study of astrology.
1: ANGULARITY AND PARTILE ASPECTS “…It is when angularity and aspect partiality coincide that outstanding incidents are most likely to come about.” Page 96, ‘Interpreting Solar Returns’, under the heading ‘Aspect Orbs’.
When first attempting to learn and prove to myself some teaching points I considered important from Jim’s book, I took the above quote from Jim’s book and conducted an experiment. I starting asking persons within my close environment-- if they had experienced an out of ordinary/‘outstanding incident’ (event) in their life, good or bad. If they told me an out of ordinary/‘outstanding incident’ had occurred in their life, I explained I was researching a certain component of astrology that could only be proven with ‘outstanding incidents’—then asked them to eye their birth certificate for their birth time. The majority of people I asked this question told me they had not experienced any out of ordinary/‘outstanding incident’ in their lives.
Also under Jim’s topic ‘Aspect Orbs’-- which I consider to be a very important teaching point:
“Another key point is the aspect curve. For conjunctions and oppositions, this is a 4 degree orb; for squares, trines and sextiles, about 3 degrees. Aspects within this range, especially transits (for the dynamic aspects), should be eagerly attended when in the Solunar foreground. We are now encountering very serious influences.” *Foreground is 7.5 degrees on either side of an angle.
“Partile aspects (1 degree orb or less) reign supreme. According to my proposed formulae, a conjunction or opposition with a 1 degree orb is at 99% of its maximum strength. Squares, trines, and sextiles register 98% of their full clout. For almost any purpose, they can indeed be considered “exact.” Aspects at this high (partile) level of potency are apt to manifest no matter what. For anything less strong, angularity is required to lend easy expressiveness to whatever configurations are present. IT IS WHEN ANGULARITY AND ASPECT PARTILITY COINCIDE THAT OUTSTANDING INCIDENTS ARE MOST LIKELY TO COME ABOUT.” (capital lettering is mine for important emphasis pertaining to this thread).
2: PARANS:—“This is the most powerful of all configurations.” Fagan/Firebrace
A Paran occurs when ‘two or more planets are simultaneously (bodily) on the same, adjacent or opposite angles.’ Jim’s book on page 21 titled Parans offers excellent examples that fully explain their importance in Sidereal Astrology. It is rare to see an active angular Paran with a SSR but when they occur they are Dynamic in effect and produce important events.
3: SSR MOON: “This, then, isolates the Moon as the most crucial agent in a Solar Return, after the angles. Lunar aspects to natal and solar planets can never be treated lightly, even when rather wide in orb. So remarkable is this single factor that, if lunar aspects are nearly exact while the foreground planets are not exceptionally close to the angles, the solar Moon can be considered the primary theme-setter of the chart for the year ahead, bar none.” Page 64, ‘Interpreting Solar Returns’.
I only discovered with my experiment and other charts of public figures, a handful of Dynamic SSR examples explained by the 3 above criteria’s from Jim’s book. I will later post these SSR examples.
I ask, as Jim has asked, for other Siderealist to post their own examples of dynamic (‘outstanding incidents’) symbolized with SSR’S.
Jim, please correct any misleading statements I may have made pertaining to your work and this topic.
Regards, Steve