Page 1 of 1

Lucky In Love

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 4:49 pm
by sotonye
I do consider myself a bit lucky generally, but one way that that luck is especially pronounced is in love. I have no idea why, but the world always seems to send me absurdly attractive girls without any effort on my part, and this is something I've always been able to count on. And so of course I'm wondering about the astrology of all this. What factors in a chart might produce luck, or perhaps even difficulty, in the arena of love?

Re: Lucky In Love

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 5:00 pm
by Jim Eshelman
You have a rising Taurus Moon - probably, therefore, a fair bit of charisma and sex appeal - and your Moon-Jupiter opposition aspects your Venus, so it's a well-aspected Venus.

Venus themed luminary. Venus well aspected. Angular Moon. Probably some other small things, but that's plenty, eh?

Re: Lucky In Love

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 10:00 pm
by sotonye
probably, therefore, a fair bit of charisma and sex appeal
I'm really not very charismatic, I mean I definitely can be, but I feel it's disingenuous in matters of love. I don't like the way it feels to charm a girl, I don't feel that it's my true face, I feel like I'm lying. I try to be as frank as possible, and, now that I think about it all, maybe this forthrightness might be its own sort of charm? I'm not sure why I'm this way.

And I don't think I have any sex appeal, I'm very boyish, I'm not sure, I'm really tall and maybe that's it
Venus themed luminary. Venus well aspected. Angular Moon. Probably some other small things, but that's plenty, eh?
Yes I think this is plenty, I never considered that having an angular moon might contribute to all of this

Re: Lucky In Love

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 10:05 pm
by Jim Eshelman
Angular Moon is the basic mark of "sex symbols" in the media, and especially of women who are the pinup figures of their time, the hot number of the moment. Fagan identified that the strength of Moon has the most to do with the amount of sexual need and energy all around.

Re: Lucky In Love

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2018 11:25 pm
by sotonye
oh wow, Madonna, Carmen Electra, Farrah Fawcett, Anna Nicole Smith, Audrey Hepburn to name a few, and some of the younger super beautiful ones include Megan Fox, Rihanna, Ariana Grande, Miranda Kerr (!!!), and Sophie Turner from game of thrones!

Fagan's finding holds true even for the beautiful girls of today, but why is this so Mr. Eshelman? I have a hard time associating the moon with desire or sexual magnetism, I'm trying to see it fit. Maybe in their case it accentuates the feminine principle, makes them into what others might consider the ideal girl

Re: Lucky In Love

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:08 am
by Jim Eshelman
sotonye wrote: Sun Aug 19, 2018 11:25 pm Fagan's finding holds true even for the beautiful girls of today, but why is this so Mr. Eshelman? I have a hard time associating the moon with desire or sexual magnetism, I'm trying to see it fit.
Well, change your mind on that :) It's pretty fundamental. Moon is subconsciousness including all the instinctual elements, and our sexuality is mde of the substance of subconsciousness. It's not a gender thing: It's the same for men or women. It's the essence that has the primary purpose of producing babies, and it brings everything forward necessary to get that job done.

Re: Lucky In Love

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:39 am
by sotonye
Jim Eshelman wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:08 am
Well, change your mind on that :) It's pretty fundamental. Moon is subconsciousness including all the instinctual elements, and our sexuality is made of the substance of subconsciousness. It's not a gender thing: It's the same for men or women. It's the essence that has the primary purpose of producing babies, and it brings everything forward necessary to get that job done.
I forgot that the moon is associated with babies, this definitely helps to see it all fit.

I have a transit from Neptune to my Moon and so hopefully I'll be able to see all of this in action, I also hope it won't be bad

Re: Lucky In Love

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 5:09 am
by Veronica
Jim Eshelman wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:08 am
sotonye wrote: Sun Aug 19, 2018 11:25 pm Fagan's finding holds true even for the beautiful girls of today, but why is this so Mr. Eshelman? I have a hard time associating the moon with desire or sexual magnetism, I'm trying to see it fit.
Well, change your mind on that :) It's pretty fundamental. Moon is subconsciousness including all the instinctual elements, and our sexuality is mde of the substance of subconsciousness. It's not a gender thing: It's the same for men or women. It's the essence that has the primary purpose of producing babies, and it brings everything forward necessary to get that job done.
interesting. in 2003 my sister and I went to a séance/mediumistic thing (not my thing at all, ever but her son had recently past and it was Halloween, so I indulged her) at this event which had about 100 people, the medium helped people in the audience with their psychic stuff and I just sat watching ( I think that sort of thing is kind of "dirty" work and don't trust those who do it). it was about half way over when this lady focused on me, and from what I recall she went on and on and on about all these children and babies that surround me. in fact it was quite unsettling to me, it wasn't like she was saying she saw one or two little souls arura bopping around me, no she was like you have hundreds of little lights flitting around you.

My moon/Neptune/Jupiter conjunction in scorpio might seem to fit very well with that "idea" she pulled out of the air even though she did not know my chart. maybe the blips were my army since scorpio is militaristic.