Question About Progressions
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 8:46 am
Primaries, secondaries, tertiaries, minor progressions, Q1, Q2, PSSR..., not to mention the converse versions of all of the above. All of them come down to a ratio based on the specific progression, for example 0.0027378030919862 for Q2 ( day for a year) or 0.0366009950851544 for tertiaries (day for a month).
So in all cases (when using mean rather than apparent progressions), multiply the elapsed time from the chart to be progressed to the time in question by the applicable ratio and add to the radix time, then cast a chart. So if I want NQ for my upcoming birthday, I will be checking the ephemeris for 6/2/1957, 62 days after my birth.
Jim has written about understanding transits as "day for a day" progressions (ratio 1.0).
Now that computers have made it feasible to investigate them, has anyone investigated progressions with ratios greater than 1.0? This would have the progressed planets moving faster than transits. These are probably too fleeting to be of practical use, but is there a good theoretical objection to them, given that progression are valid, for which there is good evidence. They might be of some use in finely tuned timing.
For example (analyzing a hypothetical event after the fact) let's say I experience an event typically associated with transiting Saturn being on an angle at that moment, but Saturn is nowhere near an angle and there is no satisfactory substitute symbolism (moon rising in Capricorn...). Might it be that a Saturn "fast progression" has become exact at the moment in question?
So in all cases (when using mean rather than apparent progressions), multiply the elapsed time from the chart to be progressed to the time in question by the applicable ratio and add to the radix time, then cast a chart. So if I want NQ for my upcoming birthday, I will be checking the ephemeris for 6/2/1957, 62 days after my birth.
Jim has written about understanding transits as "day for a day" progressions (ratio 1.0).
Now that computers have made it feasible to investigate them, has anyone investigated progressions with ratios greater than 1.0? This would have the progressed planets moving faster than transits. These are probably too fleeting to be of practical use, but is there a good theoretical objection to them, given that progression are valid, for which there is good evidence. They might be of some use in finely tuned timing.
For example (analyzing a hypothetical event after the fact) let's say I experience an event typically associated with transiting Saturn being on an angle at that moment, but Saturn is nowhere near an angle and there is no satisfactory substitute symbolism (moon rising in Capricorn...). Might it be that a Saturn "fast progression" has become exact at the moment in question?