Flu vulnerability - a Firebrace example
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:13 am
Since everyone is understandably concerned about about flu vulnerability, I thought you'd be interested in an example I came across this morning.
Brigadier Firebrace contracted a bad bout of the flu on December 16, 1967. He was down for weeks - had a hard time recovering his strength, was feverish, very foggy-brained. It's a good example of someone being heavily debility with a bad flu, so you may want to study it to see what was evident.
I'll discuss below what I see in the charts - it's a good example. First, though, I need to address a different side of his article. (This will be a digression away from the flu topic, so jump ahead if you prefer.) When Firebrace wrote about this in the April, 1968 issue of Spica (Vol. VII, No. 3), the main point of his article was to discuss the Anlunar Return (return of Moon to its Solar Return position). His article proposed that the Anlunar should be calculated for birthplace instead of residence (even if one lived far from birthplace and the SSR occurred far from birthplace). Firebrace was born in Nova Scotia and lived in London (where his SSR occurred). - This was a highly controversial assertion on his part, and, in Leo-Aries style, he was quite willing to be controversial if the evidence in front of his face suggested an unpopular point of view. In this case, he saw a stream of four Anlunars / Demi-Anlunars covering the period of his flu that did not show his debilitation for London but showed it exceptionally well for birthplace.
However, this all came from a series of mathematical errors. The charts on which he was basing this conclusion didn't exist.
Back when nobody had a computer and every chart we calculated was by hand, we all made lots of math errors. I still come across an old example in print (or in my own files) where a calculation error led to a wrong conclusion. In this case, on top of everything else, Firebrace was working on these charts while he was foggy-brained with the flu.
He was born August 16, 1889 in Halifax, NS. There are slightly different times - his given birth time, the one he gave he in a letter, one he published in Spica - apparently he was always screwing around with fine-tuning a rectification - but they were all within a quarter hour or so of each other. The one in my files (used for this study) is 4:45 PM LMT, and it matches the calculations well enough once I discovered his error, so I'll assume the 4:45 AM time for this study.
My clue, when I redid his charts to check for myself, is that I got SSR Moon about 3° than he did. I got 16°11' Capricorn and all his examples had Moon at 19°39' Capricorn. He had miscalculated his own Solar Return and that threw everything off. Firebrace's Sun was 0°54'55" Leo with his SSR August 18, 1967, 8:34 PM GMT. However, on his 1967 birthday, Moon was at 19°39' Capricorn (his calculation) six and a half hours later when Sun was at 1°10'25" Leo. (He might have gotten the time right, but miscalculated Moon.)
So the "evidence" that Anlunars should be calculated for birthplace was all wrong evidence; but the example of his flu makes quite a good case. I'll turn to it in the next post.
Brigadier Firebrace contracted a bad bout of the flu on December 16, 1967. He was down for weeks - had a hard time recovering his strength, was feverish, very foggy-brained. It's a good example of someone being heavily debility with a bad flu, so you may want to study it to see what was evident.
I'll discuss below what I see in the charts - it's a good example. First, though, I need to address a different side of his article. (This will be a digression away from the flu topic, so jump ahead if you prefer.) When Firebrace wrote about this in the April, 1968 issue of Spica (Vol. VII, No. 3), the main point of his article was to discuss the Anlunar Return (return of Moon to its Solar Return position). His article proposed that the Anlunar should be calculated for birthplace instead of residence (even if one lived far from birthplace and the SSR occurred far from birthplace). Firebrace was born in Nova Scotia and lived in London (where his SSR occurred). - This was a highly controversial assertion on his part, and, in Leo-Aries style, he was quite willing to be controversial if the evidence in front of his face suggested an unpopular point of view. In this case, he saw a stream of four Anlunars / Demi-Anlunars covering the period of his flu that did not show his debilitation for London but showed it exceptionally well for birthplace.
However, this all came from a series of mathematical errors. The charts on which he was basing this conclusion didn't exist.
Back when nobody had a computer and every chart we calculated was by hand, we all made lots of math errors. I still come across an old example in print (or in my own files) where a calculation error led to a wrong conclusion. In this case, on top of everything else, Firebrace was working on these charts while he was foggy-brained with the flu.
He was born August 16, 1889 in Halifax, NS. There are slightly different times - his given birth time, the one he gave he in a letter, one he published in Spica - apparently he was always screwing around with fine-tuning a rectification - but they were all within a quarter hour or so of each other. The one in my files (used for this study) is 4:45 PM LMT, and it matches the calculations well enough once I discovered his error, so I'll assume the 4:45 AM time for this study.
My clue, when I redid his charts to check for myself, is that I got SSR Moon about 3° than he did. I got 16°11' Capricorn and all his examples had Moon at 19°39' Capricorn. He had miscalculated his own Solar Return and that threw everything off. Firebrace's Sun was 0°54'55" Leo with his SSR August 18, 1967, 8:34 PM GMT. However, on his 1967 birthday, Moon was at 19°39' Capricorn (his calculation) six and a half hours later when Sun was at 1°10'25" Leo. (He might have gotten the time right, but miscalculated Moon.)
So the "evidence" that Anlunars should be calculated for birthplace was all wrong evidence; but the example of his flu makes quite a good case. I'll turn to it in the next post.