SteveS wrote:Jim, DC’s Cansolar Jupiter line goes through DC. Don’t we have to factor this Cansolar Jupiter line as somewhat of a longer term benefic influence, even when see malefic lunar ingress lines passing through DC? How do you weigh a Cansolar Jupiter line in DC verses a malefic lunar ingress line passing through DC?
It's another player, yes (and don't forget the Moon-Jupiter square that's part of it). Three considerations:
1. The Capsolar is stronger than a Quarter chart like the Cansolar. They can show different events but don't contradict each other per se (and, especially, the Quarter chart doesn't negate the stronger Capsolar). Also, in particular, we have many, many examples showing that Jupiter doesn't stop bad things from happening (at most, it deflects them to an adjacent time period; but, if there's no option for that, then the event just happens).
2. Not every chart in an event-stack shows the event. We have several examples where one chart seems to drop out or be a bystander or contradict the overall trend. Right now we have a very strong consistency of things shown in the Capsolar: (A) The Capsolar has Uranus and Pluto right on the anles. (B) Every single lunar ingress for months has a close (mostly partile) Moon-Uranus aspect. (C) Were in the middle of a CapQ Moon-Uranus progressed conjunction, which is also partile to the Capsolar MC. These three things cause the year, bridge, month, and week to all agree with each other independent of what the quarter chart might be saying.
3. When all the charts in one direction and then there is also Jupiter, we expect the event to be in a Jupiter situation. For example, if Jupiter is afflicted, it could be economic crisis or (with Saturn or Uranus) structural collapses. In general, Jupiter in disaster charts these days seems to mean that if it's naturally caused, it's from the weather (especially rain, flooding, etc.), and if it's human caused it's from religious, ethnic, or similar bigotry. That is, Jupiter becomes more of an adjective.
4. For DC, don't forget that there is a Moon-Neptune mundane square, too.
The question you raise BTW is why my monthly forecast describes the Cansolar as a "parallel story" to the Capsolar. I don't want to negate, weaken, or contradict the Capsolar's message in any way, but want to recognize the Cansolar's message, so I wrote of them as side-by-side stories. To use a not-quite-on parallel, we often see, in daily indicators, that the CapQ tells the main story ("at the bullfight, the bullfighter was gored and killed by the bull") and the CanQ, if it doesn't simply agrees, tells side details and end up usually being true but almost out of anybody's normal reference of the event ("...and the sunlight reflected beautifully off the spilled pools of blood, so that altogether it was a lovely day").
