Page 1 of 1

Sep 27: Louis XIII, Whitworth, Meat Loaf, Paltrow

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 11:30 am
by Jim Eshelman
Louis XIII, King of France. Sep 27, 1601 OS, 11:00 PM LAT, Fontainebleau, France (AA).
Whitworth, Kathy. Sep 27, 1939, 3:00 AM CST, Monahans, TX (AA).
Loaf, Meat. Sep 27, 1947, 4:23 PM CST, Dallas, TX (AA).
Paltrow, Gwyneth. Sep 27, 1972, 5:25 PM PDT, Los Angeles, CA (AA).

NOTE: This is a different chart than usually available for Louis XIII. Older reporting of birth records were 10 days off; this one is now correct. Also, the time has been correctly expressed as LAT. His mundoscope shows pretty vividly his difficult struggles with his mother that seem to have spilled over into his adult relationship with his wife: These barely show in his horoscope.


BONUS:
Meadows, Jayne. Sep 27, 1919, 2:01 AM LMT, Wuchang, China (AA).

Re: Sep 27: King Louis XIII & Gwyneth Paltrow

Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2021 12:06 pm
by Jim Eshelman
As if Gwyneth Paltrow's Taurus Moon weren't expressive enough of her soft grace, she has a 0°01' mundane Moon-Venus square. - I chuckled when I remembered that this Virgo woman, despite having a typical mercurial physique, won her Oscar for playing a woman who persuasively masqueraded as a man. (Virgo stellium, in fact.)

Re: Sep 27: King Louis XIII, Kathy Whitworth, Gwyneth Paltrow

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 1:44 pm
by Jim Eshelman
I just added Kathy Whitworth to this date. She's the winningest golfer in history - out-winning Sam Snead and Tiger Woods - a unique example of a woman who outright exceeded male performance in any sport. She died December 24 and, therefore, is in the news.

I'll look for a man to add to match out the pair.

Re: Sep 27: King Louis XIII, Kathy Whitworth, Gwyneth Paltrow

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2022 1:52 pm
by Jim Eshelman
I'm adding Meat Loaf.

Re: Sep 27: Louis XIII, Whitworth, Meat Loaf, Paltrow

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2022 12:47 pm
by FlorencedeZ.
Jim Eshelman wrote: Sun Sep 26, 2021 11:30 am NOTE: This is a different chart than usually available for Louis XIII. Older reporting of birth records were 10 days off; this one is now correct. Also, the time has been correctly expressed as LAT. His mundoscope shows pretty vividly his difficult struggles with his mother that seem to have spilled over into his adult relationship with his wife: These barely show in his horoscope.
Hi Jim,
I am trying to set up the chart but I do not see his difficult struggles with his mother in the mundoscope, would you mind telling what they are? Thank you.

Re: Sep 27: Louis XIII, Whitworth, Meat Loaf, Paltrow

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2022 12:58 pm
by Jim Eshelman
FlorencedeZ. wrote: Wed Dec 28, 2022 12:47 pm
Jim Eshelman wrote: Sun Sep 26, 2021 11:30 am NOTE: This is a different chart than usually available for Louis XIII. Older reporting of birth records were 10 days off; this one is now correct. Also, the time has been correctly expressed as LAT. His mundoscope shows pretty vividly his difficult struggles with his mother that seem to have spilled over into his adult relationship with his wife: These barely show in his horoscope.
Hi Jim,
I am trying to set up the chart but I do not see his difficult struggles with his mother in the mundoscope, would you mind telling what they are? Thank you.
Louis XIII's mundoscope has the following structure:

9°07' 8H - Moon
10°49' 11H - Uranus
12°50' 2H - Venus
13°06' 5H - Saturn
16°16' 11H - Pluto
17°09' 2H - Neptune

Moon and Venus are in close opposition and share (or trade off) several aspects. Moon-Venus is always a bit of a problem for men (less so in very modern times when gender roles aren't so binding) and, in any case, speaks both to his relationship with his mother and his adult love relationships. Of all the aspects in the mix, Venus square Saturn (0°16' M) is closest. The other aspects sort of fall in place around them, e.g., Moon-Uranus is not a bad aspect at all but is part of a wider set of Moon aspects and especially the Venus aspects.

Re: Sep 27: Louis XIII, Whitworth, Meat Loaf, Paltrow

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2022 1:09 pm
by FlorencedeZ.
Thanks Jim.
Makes sense indeed. In the 1600's society and roles were completely different, totally uncomparable.