BlueKnight22 wrote: Sun Jan 02, 2022 12:35 pm
What I can not figure out is how to run it to generate the Mean Quotidian angles (for Tropical).
When I run it for the Mean Quotidian ascendant it produces different results than when I secondary progress the Mean Quotidian AC forward in steps of 1 year.
Do you mean as an ephemeris? That would be rough (unless, of course, somebody specifically programmed it).
It's easy to run the chart itself, though. Here's the easiest way to monitor it with Solar Fire. Under "Solar Fire Tips," I posted a modified tri-wheel that sets the MIDDLE wheel as progressions so that this is the chart that gives the cusps.
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=12
Download and substitute this as your default tri-wheel ring. Then just pick your natal (for the locality where you are currently located) and click Dynamic > Animate Triwheel. You'll get natal planets in the inmost ring, progressed in the middle, transits on the outside and you can easily shift the date or use the errors to move it forward and backwards one day at a time.
There is a mathematical problem with SF and all other current software on this, though. In fairness, I should call this a theoretical problem, though we will soon be in a place to confirm it. The problem is that the correct formula for secondary progressions should be one mean solar day equals one
sidereal year, while all existing software uses one
tropical year. (Since you favor the Tropical zodiac, you may disagree in theory.) This creates a double problem as one ages:
(1) If you are calculating tropically, then there is the matter of precession distorting
transiting planets to quotidian angles, though natal and progressed planets won't have this problem. By age 72, the error is 1° (half a degree at age 36, etc.).
(2) The problem of using the tropical year instead of sidereal year doubles the problem, because it creates a separate (more or less unrelated) error that is almost exactly the same rate as precession. (I overcame this in Mark Pottenger's wonderful CCRS software years ago by forcing the sidereal year to be used if one were using the Sidereal zodiac; but the error exists in SF.)
This means that, as one approaches age 70, close to 2° error on quotidian angles exists. You can cut this in half by calculating everything in the Sidereal zodiac, but it still leaves the second error. This will be overcome in the next few months as Mike Nelson's free TMSA software adds transits and progressions, since he'll use the correct formula.