U.S. Horoscope - Donald Bradley 1951
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 1:44 am
[These excerpts are from the fourth (and final) of four early articles I have by Tropical astrologer Donald Bradley on the U.S. horoscope.
He began this installment addressing those who had tried to rebut his previous arguments on the "Libra-rising chart." They are probably worthwhile to show where his general thinking was evolving while still a Tropical adtrologer - the thinking that led him to a different view of things.]
WORDS OF CAUTION. Rebuttals to our argument in favor of the Libra-rising United States horoscope have been very interesting, and we appreciate the good sportsmanship shown by our friends and colleagues who lend the support of their convictions to other proposed charts. Our blanket-answer to most of the material used in support of these other charts is that there has been too great a tendency to take liberties with the simplest astrological symbolism.
Mars is primarily the significator of war, and Saturn of the deaths of Presidents. Such elementary precepts must be adhered to as a basis for testing a speculative mundane chart, or there is just no rational way to test any kind of astrological chart. It is not sufficient to merely demonstrate the prominence of several “bad” aspects for a comparably adverse event. The probability of finding a few squares and oppositions in operation at any given time is too great to consider it “proof positive” that such-and-such a chart must be radical. Where the subject of war is concerned, better find one lone configuration of Mars than a half-dozen squares, oppositions, or parallels involving planets other than the Planet of War.
Moreover, citing parallels of declination in a mooted chart is risky business. Parallels come by the handful, as anyone experienced in chart-work knows. They may be significant, true, but at any random moment of time, event or no event, there may easily be between five and a dozen parallels within the customary one-degree orb of effectiveness. Research work must be rooted in the two principles that (a) like planets attract like events, and (by), the more momentous the event, the more prominent the corresponding configuration. Students who abide by these principles will not wander awry in their studies, to become lost in a maze of trivia.
Another note of caution to the newer student: Mind those angular cusps! We feel that there is not enough appreciation of the importance of the horizon and meridian nowadays, since the trend of recent decades in modern astrology has been toward more and more detailed systematizing of the meanings of the individual houses. Nobody realizes this more painfully than the mundane astrologer, who knows that Mars angular in a mundane chart indicates a heavy mortality toll from accidents across the nation much more surely than when that planet occupies the Third House, normally said to suggest this situation. The Third is a cadent house, and to have a malefic planet cadent is far more desirable than to have it near an angle. As a further illustration, Saturn in the Sixth is believed to increase the deathrate from diseases, malnutrition, and physical exposure. Again, this is a cadent position, and there is reason to doubt the validity of the idea, since Saturn in any of the four angular houses, notably the Ascendant or Fourth, would more logically bring about those conditions, if the consistency of astrological symbolism is to be upheld in making our interpretations and predictions. Saturn in the Tenth, moreover, has accurately foretold the deaths of Presidents and prominent public leaders, but none of the six Presidents who have passed away in office did so when the Midheaven ruler was in the Eighth, nor has there been anything particularly significant concerning “afflictions” to the Tenth-house rulers in the six cases. We who are regularly engaged in research are learning to be ever wary of the numerous pitfalls of ill logic into which a student can so easily fall.
[He next reviewed a book in a way that must have been uncomfortable, since he was the pseudonymous author!]
Applause. Lewis Howard of Hollywood deserves an Oscar for his achievement in research on the United States’ horoscope, the results of which he has prepared in interesting detail in a manuscript soon to be published by Llewellyn Publications, Ltd., entitled Astrology and the United States. Yours truly was lucky enough to have been privileged a pre-publication reading of this little book, and is enthusiastic in his endorsement.
Mr. Howard obviously has given the subject a great deal of deep and careful thought. Students of astrology everywhere owe it to themselves to peruse the product of this man’s study, which represents a worthwhile contribution to our field’s Astrologia Americana, A laudatory feature of his book is the original experimental approach he makes to determine which of the several possible charts is most likely the true radix of the United States of America. With commonsense, so keen it is even dramatic, Lewis Howard demonstrates the fact that the Libra-rising chart is a remarkable symbolical map of the continental U.S.! By employing the age-old principles of “Geographical Astrology,” Howard shows that every basic social, economic, and even tellural, region, from coast to coast, and from border to border, is clearly symbolized by the positions and dispositions of the Libra-rising wheel.
Equally interesting is his analysis of seven major events in American history with full-page illustrations. The climaxes in the development of our nation he treats, in the light of transits and progressions, include the outbreak and ending of the Civil War, the declaration and armistice of World War I, the great stock-market crash of 1929, Pearl Harbor, and the Japanese Surrender which ended World War II. The author should be praised for his accomplishment, which is particularly attractive to us, not alone because it endorses the Libra chart, but because the “atmosphere” of his research has been kept clear of the smog of trivialities in that he adhered to those “first principles of research” we mentioned a few paragraphs back.
He began this installment addressing those who had tried to rebut his previous arguments on the "Libra-rising chart." They are probably worthwhile to show where his general thinking was evolving while still a Tropical adtrologer - the thinking that led him to a different view of things.]
WORDS OF CAUTION. Rebuttals to our argument in favor of the Libra-rising United States horoscope have been very interesting, and we appreciate the good sportsmanship shown by our friends and colleagues who lend the support of their convictions to other proposed charts. Our blanket-answer to most of the material used in support of these other charts is that there has been too great a tendency to take liberties with the simplest astrological symbolism.
Mars is primarily the significator of war, and Saturn of the deaths of Presidents. Such elementary precepts must be adhered to as a basis for testing a speculative mundane chart, or there is just no rational way to test any kind of astrological chart. It is not sufficient to merely demonstrate the prominence of several “bad” aspects for a comparably adverse event. The probability of finding a few squares and oppositions in operation at any given time is too great to consider it “proof positive” that such-and-such a chart must be radical. Where the subject of war is concerned, better find one lone configuration of Mars than a half-dozen squares, oppositions, or parallels involving planets other than the Planet of War.
Moreover, citing parallels of declination in a mooted chart is risky business. Parallels come by the handful, as anyone experienced in chart-work knows. They may be significant, true, but at any random moment of time, event or no event, there may easily be between five and a dozen parallels within the customary one-degree orb of effectiveness. Research work must be rooted in the two principles that (a) like planets attract like events, and (by), the more momentous the event, the more prominent the corresponding configuration. Students who abide by these principles will not wander awry in their studies, to become lost in a maze of trivia.
Another note of caution to the newer student: Mind those angular cusps! We feel that there is not enough appreciation of the importance of the horizon and meridian nowadays, since the trend of recent decades in modern astrology has been toward more and more detailed systematizing of the meanings of the individual houses. Nobody realizes this more painfully than the mundane astrologer, who knows that Mars angular in a mundane chart indicates a heavy mortality toll from accidents across the nation much more surely than when that planet occupies the Third House, normally said to suggest this situation. The Third is a cadent house, and to have a malefic planet cadent is far more desirable than to have it near an angle. As a further illustration, Saturn in the Sixth is believed to increase the deathrate from diseases, malnutrition, and physical exposure. Again, this is a cadent position, and there is reason to doubt the validity of the idea, since Saturn in any of the four angular houses, notably the Ascendant or Fourth, would more logically bring about those conditions, if the consistency of astrological symbolism is to be upheld in making our interpretations and predictions. Saturn in the Tenth, moreover, has accurately foretold the deaths of Presidents and prominent public leaders, but none of the six Presidents who have passed away in office did so when the Midheaven ruler was in the Eighth, nor has there been anything particularly significant concerning “afflictions” to the Tenth-house rulers in the six cases. We who are regularly engaged in research are learning to be ever wary of the numerous pitfalls of ill logic into which a student can so easily fall.
[He next reviewed a book in a way that must have been uncomfortable, since he was the pseudonymous author!]
Applause. Lewis Howard of Hollywood deserves an Oscar for his achievement in research on the United States’ horoscope, the results of which he has prepared in interesting detail in a manuscript soon to be published by Llewellyn Publications, Ltd., entitled Astrology and the United States. Yours truly was lucky enough to have been privileged a pre-publication reading of this little book, and is enthusiastic in his endorsement.
Mr. Howard obviously has given the subject a great deal of deep and careful thought. Students of astrology everywhere owe it to themselves to peruse the product of this man’s study, which represents a worthwhile contribution to our field’s Astrologia Americana, A laudatory feature of his book is the original experimental approach he makes to determine which of the several possible charts is most likely the true radix of the United States of America. With commonsense, so keen it is even dramatic, Lewis Howard demonstrates the fact that the Libra-rising chart is a remarkable symbolical map of the continental U.S.! By employing the age-old principles of “Geographical Astrology,” Howard shows that every basic social, economic, and even tellural, region, from coast to coast, and from border to border, is clearly symbolized by the positions and dispositions of the Libra-rising wheel.
Equally interesting is his analysis of seven major events in American history with full-page illustrations. The climaxes in the development of our nation he treats, in the light of transits and progressions, include the outbreak and ending of the Civil War, the declaration and armistice of World War I, the great stock-market crash of 1929, Pearl Harbor, and the Japanese Surrender which ended World War II. The author should be praised for his accomplishment, which is particularly attractive to us, not alone because it endorses the Libra chart, but because the “atmosphere” of his research has been kept clear of the smog of trivialities in that he adhered to those “first principles of research” we mentioned a few paragraphs back.