Yardsticks for Rulerships
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2023 3:01 pm
I just found another letter of mine published in American Astrology. It's in the July 1975 issue under the headline "Yardsticks for Rulerships." What I find interesting about this is that it is a trace on where an idea came from - something that I don't think had been talked about (at least, not much) until that time, and which remains one of my core practical teachings about signs.
Sometimes a new perspective on an old problem will enable some people to view it more clearly. As I have written many times, I think that the rulerships are best viewed as teaching devices, meant to explain the basic characteristics of each sign. It is so easy (especially with the Sidereal zodiac) to think of a Sagittarian simply as a Jupiter type, or a Taurean as a Venusian.
While reading capsulized biographies of Nathanial Hawthorne, Calvin Coolidge, and other Sidereal Geminians I have become impressed by a blatantly Saturn-like quality about such people. Saturn is in Coolidge's 5th house (non-angular) and in wide opposition to his Sun, but I certainly wouldn't call it his strongest planet. And though I don't have a birthtime for Hawthorne, his Solar chart shows no particular emphasis on the somber planet. (If his birth were very early in the day we might find a Moon-Saturn trine, but that is all.)
Geminians are noted for their fondness of coin and their unusual ability to acquire money. It is a business sign, as ruling Mercury suggests, with particular emphasis on the free enterprise system ad "big business" in general. Several of these near-Saturnian traits could be explained by a greedy Mercury type, but not the dwelling on morbid thoughts and nearly Puritanical (at times) behavior and attitudes of Geminians. The alcohol consumption of people with this Sun sign can be frightening and the charts in my file indicate a possible predisposition to mental frustration under severe affliction, more so than other sign types.
After a few moments it occurred to me that while Saturn is given no particular dignity in Gemini (and especially not in the Tropical counterpart, Cancer), Gemini is opposite Jupiter-ruled Sagittarius, hence very un-Jupiterian. How much more un-Jupiterian can you get than to be Saturnian? Of course, the Geminian predilection to youthful things excludes a perfect Saturn match, but there is enough of the Grim Reaper among the twins (did not one carry a sickle!) to warrant some consideration. Similarly, even those of us who think Aris is primarily Plutonian don't need to discard Mars entirely, since its opposition to Libra makes Aries non-Venusian, hence Martian. Authoritarianism belongs to Capricorn not only because it is Saturnian, but because it is also contra-lunar, or Solar. Sidereal Aquarius is a soft (lunar?) type of sign, gentle and sensuous, because the opposing sign is very Sun-oriented, etc.
As I said in the beginning, this is nothing profound or earth-shaking, but it may be a different way of looking at things that some would find appealing. I'm gradually becoming much less formal and rigid in my views on rulership schemes and coming to use them more and more as liquid, adaptable things modified to suit the question, and always subject to modification as perspectives and attitudes change.
James A. Eshelman, Indianapolis, Ind.