SteveS wrote:Dorothy Malone AA rated: 1/29/1924 8:00 AM Chicago, Illinois
Again we see Jupiter angular for an acting career with a tight square to Venus, Venus partile 90 MC, a most potent Venus-Jupiter natal signature. Mercury opposses Pluto, another signature we are seeing with natives who specialize in certain fields of communications. Lib Moon partile 120 Venus. Uranus partile cnj Vx axis. Mundo Neptune 2,58 cnj Dsc, probably symbolizing her acting career in the movies, however she had an up-down career where it is stated in her bio:American actress, she studied dancing as a child, and while in school modeled for Neiman-Marcus.
Overall, it was an up-and-down career in which she seems to have made a number of bad choices.
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Malone%2C_Dorothy
Dorothy Malone (Actress)
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Dorothy Malone (Actress)
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
www.jeshelman.com
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Re: Dorothy Malone (Actress)
A classic chart of the charm and wonder of the late glamorous era of Hollywood.
Yes, Jupiter is foreground - the "actor" planet per Gauquelin research - and in close configuration to a foreground Venus-Uranus conjunction. This one is quite important, I think, because it was by shedding her "good girl" image (acting like Venus-Uranus a little bit out of control, e.g., embodying a very Capricorn-Libra nymphomaniac, or in sultry, scandalous stories such as Peyton Place) that she found her greatest success. The public more naturally "bought" her in that kind of role.
The foreground Venus-Uranus conjunction seems to be the real key to the nature of her success, even though Neptune is her most angular planet (and Jupiter is more angular than Venus-Uranus). She also had a foreground Sun. - The Venus-Uranus in Aquarius stands on its own, and is squared by the Jupiter, and (importantly) is trine Moon: Moon-Venus and Moon-Uranus are noted for charisma, sex appeal, novelty, intrigue, etc.
I'd be interested to see how her Neptune manifest over time. I don't know enough of her actual character to know its subtleties. What I'm noticing is that Neptune is her most angular planet, and essentially unaspected, but is only 0°04' from the Mars/Saturn midpoint. When this became particularly active, I'd expect some bitter, hurtful life experiences.
PS - Oops, missed the Pluto trines to Moon and Venus-Uranus. This upscales most of what I wrote above, and generally intensifies the strain on her personal emotional life. (Her three marriages and divorces wouldn't be a big deal today, but was mostly the stuff of "those crazy Hollywood people" in the '50s.)
Yes, Jupiter is foreground - the "actor" planet per Gauquelin research - and in close configuration to a foreground Venus-Uranus conjunction. This one is quite important, I think, because it was by shedding her "good girl" image (acting like Venus-Uranus a little bit out of control, e.g., embodying a very Capricorn-Libra nymphomaniac, or in sultry, scandalous stories such as Peyton Place) that she found her greatest success. The public more naturally "bought" her in that kind of role.
The foreground Venus-Uranus conjunction seems to be the real key to the nature of her success, even though Neptune is her most angular planet (and Jupiter is more angular than Venus-Uranus). She also had a foreground Sun. - The Venus-Uranus in Aquarius stands on its own, and is squared by the Jupiter, and (importantly) is trine Moon: Moon-Venus and Moon-Uranus are noted for charisma, sex appeal, novelty, intrigue, etc.
I'd be interested to see how her Neptune manifest over time. I don't know enough of her actual character to know its subtleties. What I'm noticing is that Neptune is her most angular planet, and essentially unaspected, but is only 0°04' from the Mars/Saturn midpoint. When this became particularly active, I'd expect some bitter, hurtful life experiences.
PS - Oops, missed the Pluto trines to Moon and Venus-Uranus. This upscales most of what I wrote above, and generally intensifies the strain on her personal emotional life. (Her three marriages and divorces wouldn't be a big deal today, but was mostly the stuff of "those crazy Hollywood people" in the '50s.)
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
www.jeshelman.com