SteveS wrote: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:12 am
Jim, I have never worked much with Lunation Charts in the mundane world. Can you offer some sound rules or a book you would recommend?
I'm going to interpret this question more broadly as referring to syzygies in general. BTW astrologers commonly use "lunation" incorrectly, as if it meant the New Moon event itself. It doesn't. It means the time period between to successive New Moons. Also, I suspect you want t ask about Full Moons just as much as New Moons, so all of my remarks below apply to the two of them interchangeably. The best term for the actual event (occurrence) of a New Moon or Full Moon is
syzygy.
First, think about the syzygy itself - the actual New Moon or Full Moon - without thinking about its chart. (I think this directly touches the ways I've seen you mentioning these in your financial posts.) A New Moon or Full Moon is primarily
a stronger-than-usual Sun transit. Every year, Sun conjoins, oppose, and squares each thing in your chart, always on about the same day. These are always important, yet start to feel routine - "same ol', same ol'." If this occurs as Sun and Moon form their exact conjunction (New Moon) or opposition (Full Moon), it's stronger than usual. Not a
gigantic thing, just a Sun transit (always important) that's more important than most years. (And if it's an eclipse, then it becomes a
very serious Sun transit.)
This is the most flexible, usable use of these astronomical events: They are stronger than usual Sun transits. Their effect is on the day of the syzygy partile aspecting a natal planet (and perhaps secondary things spinning out of that). It's an event, not a period.
Now we turn to the syzygy charts themselves as used in mundane astrology.
Tropical mundane astrologers, not having Sidereal ingresses, rely on syzygy charts as their most important medium-term charts. Bradley wrote monthly predictions based on them for years before discovering Sidereal ingresses, and wrote them for many years after under a variety of pen names. The basic way they use them is surely wrong: They are primarily house-driven, with one clear rule that is easy to test (and will quickly disprove itself): The house(s) of luminaries in these, for a nation's capital is said to show the primary themes occupying the attention of the country for two weeks. If you watch this for three to six months, you'll quickly decide that you can't justify that rule at all.
Here is a surprise for you: Angles aren't all that important either. If something is closely angular then, sure, it will be important - but the charts aren't angle-driven like ingresses. This means that they affect the whole world more than a location. It is very hard - almost impossible - to get any
localization out of them.
BTW the New Moon
may cover an entire month like a full lunar return, though there is no doubt that the Full Moon has a comparably strong voice in the second half.
For example, suppose there is a sudden outburst of wildfires in some areas of the country. Run the syzygy charts and you generally will not find Mars on an angle (it's about as common as random distribution). However, you'll likely find that the outbreak occurred when the syzygy Sun-Moon were aspecting Mars.
Also, don't limit yourself to hard aspects. Prioritize them, but don't limit the way we know that solunar returns and Sidereal ingress aspects need to be limited. For instance, the next New Moon March 10 occurs at 25°12' Aquarius sextile Uranus. Nothing else significantly aspects the New Moon, so it will begin two weeks of likely mild-yet-distinct Uranian events.
The New Moon before December 7, 1941 occurred November 18 at 2°21' Scorpio. Everywhere in the world, it opposed Saturn at 1°02' Taurus and Uranus at 4°30' Taurus. One might extend to the octile of Mars at 17°38' Pisces. So the forecast should have said that a bad thing - with elements of surprise and violence - would occur. But where? They weren't angular in Washington, at Pearl Harbor (Jupiter was angular!), or in Tokyo. The chart didn't
localize. But there is no doubt it was showing events well described by the New Moon's very close opposition to Saturn and additional aspects to Mars and Uranus.
The Full Moon November 25 was less obvious and, in fact, for Washington had Venus closely setting. It was, however, Venus conjunct Mars, and in Washington the mundane Venus-Mars conjunction was closer than the ecliptic one the world generally got (though Venus was still clearly stronger). The Full Moon trine-sextiled Uranus within about 2° so, sure, it was a surprise, though not as vividly described as in the New Moon chart.
So the first rule is to interpret them by aspects to the luminaries - and don't expect angles to capture the primary feel of the chart. Planets closely on angles are simply one more aspect in the aspect set.
The other main rule I'd suggest is that other aspects in the chart are also part of the story. Again, don't limit yourself to hard aspects as if you were reading a return, and don't presume you are getting anything localized to a particular place.
Going back to that November 18, 1941 New Moon, besides the syzygy aspecting Saturn, Mars, and Uranus there was a close Venus-Mars square - common for war or other "relationship conflict" in political charts, especially since Venus octile Uranus 0°01'. War is all over the chart - it just doesn't tell war
where.
When you get the angularities, they may seduce you - but they aren't reliable or consistently important. The New Moon September 14, 2023 (before October 7) for Tel Aviv does have Pluto at MC and Jupiter-Uranus straddling Ascendant. It's really impressive! But you won't usually get that. The more immediate Full Moon occurred September 29 - the Full Moon is unaspected and the most important aspects were again the war-leaning aspects of Venus square Uranus and sextile Mars. "Unfriendly neighbor" aggression somewhere in the world was highly likely. For Tel Aviv, Mercury and Neptune were moderately foreground - on opposite sides of horizon so that their mundane midpoint is most relevant - primarily showing confusion, disorientation, failure to apply intelligence information, etc. But one has to be careful not to strain for moe details than are actually in the chart.
Meanwhile (and in contrast), the Canlunar that morning had Saturn closely rising in Tel Aviv, opposite Venus in the foreground, with Moon in partile mundane opposition to Pluto. THAT is a slam-dunk description!