August 24, 2014, 3:20:44 AM PDT, 38N12'50", 122W19'08"
CAPSOLAR
Neptune on Dsc < 3°
CAPLUNAR
Pluto on MC < 3°, Uranus rising ~2°. Uranus-Pluto sq. 0°14' mundo
CAPQ
t. Uranus, s. Uranus on angles
Also: t. Neptune on Capsolar Dsc < 1°
CANQ
various Neptunes on WP < 2°
6.1 Napa quake
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
6.1 Napa quake
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
www.jeshelman.com
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Re: 6.1 Napa quake
Latest: Injuries are over 200. The Governor has declared a state of emergency. Power cut off to 70,000 people. Felt as far south as Santa Cruz. No fatalities. Significant property damage in Napa-Sonoma, not much anywhere else.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
www.jeshelman.com
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Re: 6.1 Napa quake
Debbie wrote:I'm a little concerned about the Santa Barbara area. The Sept. 5 Caplunar has an exact Pluto/IC and on Sept. 17 the CapQ has both Saturns on DC.
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Re: 6.1 Napa quake
That IS close (5' in mundo).Debbie wrote:I'm a little concerned about the Santa Barbara area. The Sept. 5 Caplunar has an exact Pluto/IC and on Sept. 17 the CapQ has both Saturns on DC.
The good news is that this isn't a very seismically unstable area. The bad news is that the line continues due north through Fresno and near some shaky areas. Plus, for LA, Pluto is only 19' off the IC and now is joined by Uranus on WP. Southern California has an unusually seismically active year with Neptune on a Capsolar angle, so this could be a vulnerable time.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
www.jeshelman.com
- Jim Eshelman
- Are You Sirius?
- Posts: 19062
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm
Re: 6.1 Napa quake
Debbie wrote:I hope not but keep your hard hat close by. I note that Mercury is also angular in the CapQ. Does this describe a different event?Jim Eshelman wrote:this could be a vulnerable time.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
www.jeshelman.com