Solunars by Aldebaran Sidereal Academy

Yesterday the financials on Wall Street were clobbered losing 4 trillion $ in value, most likely due to Trump’s incoming Tariffs he is implementing against certain countries. Trump’s Solar Quotidian (SQ) featured his SQ (secondary progressed solar moon) yesterday at market close:

SQ Moon 11,49 Vir
Natal Neptune 11,51 Vir

Cyril Fagan in his writings discussed the importance of dynamic 0 90 180 aspects of secondary progressed solar moons with solar and natal planets associated with significant life events. Fagan felt so strongly about secondary progressed solar moons aspects he used em with significant life events to rectify Natal Charts. I am sure Trump experienced great disappointed (Neptune) by the reaction the financials had yesterday to these potential oncoming tariffs. We need more time to know for sure if yesterday's significant bearish market action was Trump's main life event in his current solar year with the culmination of this downward market. If yesterday market action turns out to be his main SQ Moon-Neptune event, this also is a strong indication that Trump’s birth time is very close to being very accurate with a near exact conjunction of his SQ Moon to his Natal Neptune.

Inside wheel Trump’s SQ; outside wheel Trump’s Natal:

https://ibb.co/R1ZkDdZ

Great catch. I'd missed thst one. Dead onm

BTW, while much of last week's market drop was attributed to the tariff yo-yo, yesterday was different. It was triggered by Trump on Sunday that, sure, we're likely to have a recession "in the short term" and people shouldn't watch the stock market to judge how his policies are working. (I paraphrase from memory but I think that's a fair summary of what he said.)

Saturn is about to close in on his luminares. Solar Arc Neptune is hitting his Moon.

Since January 30, it's been a steady roll downhill.

Another 500 down this morning, but we still have all day to see how it shakes out.

Wall Street Journal, which is conservative in its editorial leaning and solid on its financial reporting, just published an article, "Wall Street Fears Trump W\ill Wreck Soft Landing," acknowledging that the Biden administration already landed smoothly and that recovery is now at risk.

WSJ wrote:For the past year, U.S. economic policymakers have been singularly focused on achieving a so-called soft landing that brings inflation down without a recession. Now, a new team of pilots are considering a course correction that, by their own acknowledgement, might tip the economy toward a hard landing.

President Trump and his senior advisers in recent days have signaled indifference to rising risks that trade uncertainty chills private-sector investment They have argued a 'detox' might be needed in spending and hiring, that falling stock values aren't a big worry, and that inflation could rise in the short run.

After recapping Sunday's remarks they continued,

...Trump inherited an economy with steady growth and lofty stock markets but vulnerabilities from a frozen housing sector and a cooling labor market. Investors began the year indifferent to those blemishes because they expected the new administration to focus on revving up growth. Stocks soared after Trump's election in November as investors anticipated a bullish cocktail of tax cuts and deregulation, as occurred in his first year as president in 2017.

"People could only see the good side of what Trump was promising to do. That has basically evaporated, and now, we're back to recession watch," said [one of those guys the newspapers always quote].

Market watchers have seen bad trends lately. The shift (according to the article) is that last week it looked like the Trump administration saw the signs and would blame Biden for having handed over a bad economy. As of Sunday this has switched to, "Oh, don't worry about the bad stuff, it doesn't really matter." This is worrisome.