Why Johnnie Could Not Draw (Millard example)

Q&A and discussion on Medical Astrology (the astrology of health and illness)
Post Reply
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Why Johnnie Could Not Draw (Millard example)

Post by Jim Eshelman »

Joseph, July 24, 1968, 9:23 am EDT, Portland, ME
Johnnie, July 24, 1968, 9:28 am EDT, Portland, ME
Dr. Millard wrote:The last time I saw Johnnie was when he had his pre-school physical. When I examine the five-year-olds who are about to enter kindergarten, I ask them to draw a man. The extremely immature ones will hang their heads and refuse. Some will draw pictures which are so bizarre that you wonder what can be going on in the mind of the child. Johnnie drew a man which was so small that I could hardly see it. He was the normal twin and his brother Joe was the sickly one who had all the attention of the family from the age of three months. Johnnie feels small and insignificant.

The case is very baffling. There is only five minutes difference in the birth times, and yet there is all the difference in the world between the modes of expression of the planetary energies in the two cases...

Until the age of three months, both twins grew and developed normally. Then Joe began to have seizures, and was admitted to the hospital in status epilepticus, a potentially fatal disorder in which the seizures are so continuous that the brain cannot get enough oxygen. Unless the seizures can be stopped, the patient will die... None of the consultants called in knew what was going on and the only suggestion they could make was to send the child to specialists in Boston.

I was the pediatric resident on duty the night Joey was admitted. We first tried to stop his seizures with phenobarb and Dilantin, then we sought the cause. It turned out to be hypoglycemia, the rarest cause in children of this age... His blood sugar was so low that we thought the lab must have made an error and repeated it... This [low level] is supposed to be incompatible with life. He did not die, but unfortunately suffered severe brain damage, which is irreversible.

The problem which was never solved satisfactorily was the mechanism of the hypoglycemia... It was impossible to make a diagnosis. The presumptive evidence was for a number of scattered wild cells in the pancreas, producing insulin in excess... but not in a circumscribed area where it could be removed surgically.

He was sent home on an experimental drug... which kept his blood sugar reasonably normal, but is mother also had to feed him with a high protein - low carbohydrate diet every three or four hours day and night. His seizure threshold was low... he seized easily, and was not completely controlled, even with maximum doses of Dilantin.

Hypoglycemia is still a confusing disease, especially in children. There are many metabolic pathways by which the needs of the brain and body can be met. There are two organs which use glucose, but do not need insulin in order to get it into their cells. These are the brain and the red blood cells. [A long discussion of the many pathways follows. Most areas of the body are at least peripherally implicated.]

...Finally [the experts in Boston] decided that his pancreas should be removed. This would have meant lifelong diabetes and his parents would not give their consent, especially since it was obvious that his brain was already badly damaged. They compromised and removed half. The half pancreas was... flown to Denmark, where one of the world's foremost authorities on infantile hypoglycemia has his research lab. No insulinoma was found...

As Joey grew older, his hypoglycemia improved. He wears braces, and attends the special school for children with cerebral palsy. Of course, his brain is very damaged, and he will never be able to do much with his life. Johnnie goes to the local school and is now in the fourth grade... I have not seen Johnnie for several years, but last time I saw him, he could not draw. One wonders how much psychological damage was done to him at the time that his twin almost died.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: Why Johnnie Could Not Draw (Millard example)

Post by Jim Eshelman »

My analysis: As I read this, I kept thinking that there is a Venus affliction. For Joey, it's a Venus disease. For Johnnie, it sounds like a damage to the "my mirror image" sibling-affinity Venus function. But, at a glance, I don't see a Venus problem. In fact, the charts are rather boring except for the rising planets.

There is one very close Venus minor aspect, but I wouldn't usually call it an affliction: Venus is semisquare Uranus 0°09'.

The really obvious patterns are the Moon-Mercury-Mars triple conjunction in Gemini with Moon and Mars also trine Neptune and sextile Pluto. In fact, Moon sextile Pluto 0°03' is the closest major aspect in the chart: Johnnie has it 0°00', which is interesting: The closer orb (even on a sextile) shows stronger psychological impact, but since it's a sextile we don't expect it to affect physical health, so it's probably not a factor in Joey's case. Moon-Mars also squares Saturn mundanely.

The basic health considerations:
  • Background Sun unaspected means lower natural vitality.
  • Moon and Mars in Gemini affect legs [nothing there] or perhaps nervous system, especially since they are widely conjunct Mercury. By the close trine to Neptune, the basic impact may have a toxic element.
  • Moon-Mars conj 1°13'
  • Mars-Saturn sq 1°00'M Joey, 1°05' Johnnie
  • Moon-Saturn sq 1°26'M Joey, 1°18' Johnnie
  • Moon-Mercury conj 2°26'M Joey, 2°33' Johnnie
  • Pluto rising 1°42' for Joey, 2°36' for Johnnie
There is no Venus affliction. Venus is the most background planet - there is acute deficiency of Venus - but not the sort of thing I was expecting.

The main factors seem to be the Moon-Mars conjunction in Gemini conjunct Mercury but - closer - square Saturn mundanely. It's quite severe and especially affects Moon and Gemini things. There is also the rising Pluto - suitable alone for the extraordinary case - that is higher impact for Joey (not a BIG difference, but big enough to notice: It's no mystery that Joey is more withdrawn and suffered harder impact).

I can't say that I know the source of Joey's hypoglycemia any more than the world-class experts with real medical knowledge who consulted on this. Joey's brain damage is visible - I'm sure it's the double-affliction to his Gemini Moon, perhaps supported by the high-impact angular Pluto. But what of the underlying cause? (And why him and not his younger twin?)

Moon-Mars means inflammation. This was surely a factor (it's a known factor in epilepsy, plus they had him on a low-inflammation diet).

Moon-Saturn seems to fit only in the broad sense that it is often adverse for health (especially in combination with Moon-Mars).

Mars-Saturn isn't obvious to me other than in the general sense. I could speculate several things, but I think the meaning here is just "rough stuff, danger," etc.

Moon-Mercury affects brain activity. That much is clear.

The inflammation idea, hint of toxins, potential for some allergic element from Moon-Mercury or an autoimmune response from Moon-Mars all seem to fit into a pattern that is now known to be behind diabetes (increasingly classified as an autoimmune disease). It's even possible he consumed something that poisoned him and started the body reacting, and perhaps this was missed in the earliest rounds of tests (did its damage and then fled the system). Again, I'm guessing.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
User avatar
Jim Eshelman
Are You Sirius?
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 12:40 pm

Re: Why Johnnie Could Not Draw (Millard example)

Post by Jim Eshelman »

Let's take a pass through the Novien...

This is interesting (and again involves signs): The 0°00' and 0°03' Moon-Pluto sextiles become virtually exact oppositions in the Novien - dominating the chart - and may tie to the pancreas! First, they fall with Moon in Virgo and Pluto in Pisces, with the Virgo-Pisces axis seeming to link to the pancreas (based on cases of pancreas cancer I've seen). Second, Venus is less than 2° from Moon-Pluto: The Novien has a QUITE CLEAR Venus issue, with a 0° Moon-Pluto opposition within 2° of conjunct/opposite Venus (sugar metabolism). And it's on natal Saturn!!

Furthermore, the Moon-Pluto squares their natal Moon-Mars.

Is this the key? Is it that simple? Here are the planets (using Joey):

26°34' Gemini - r Moon
27°48' Gemini - r Mars
29°10' Virgo - N9 Moon
29°35' Pisces - N9 Pluto
1°06' Aries - r Saturn
1°01' Aries - N9 Venus


I don't expect to find anything useful from the Novien angles, but let's check while we have the chance, eh? Joey has Novien MC just over 3° from Neptune and (no clear meaning I can see) Novien Asc opposite Novien Mercury 25' and square Novien Jupiter.

Johnnie has the worse angular contacts: Novien MC squares Novien Sturn 0°34'. Again, we get unpersuasive results considering Novien angles, reinforcing my standing opinion that they are invalid and don't exist.
Jim Eshelman
www.jeshelman.com
Post Reply