Page 1 of 1

Does the Eastpoint hold any significance?

Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:40 am
by Antares5
I see that Pluto is soon gonna be conjunct my Eastpoint. Is the Eastpoint treated as something like the Ascendant or should I just ignore any transits to it?

Re: Does the Eastpoint hold any significance?

Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:38 am
by James Condor
Pretty confusing terms sometimes on forum. At one point I noticed people were suddenly using the term Eastpoint. From my understanding eastpoint is the same as the ascendant. Is this true?

Re: Does the Eastpoint hold any significance?

Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:45 am
by Jim Eshelman
No, Eastpoint is not the same as the Ascendant. It's the point of the ecliptic that squares Midheaven along the equator.

Yes, it is quite important in transits - give it full value. One tricky thing, though: You can't accurately measure the conjunction in longitude. It is measured in right ascension (i.e., along the equator). The good news is that Pluto's latitude is not so great right now, and the two measurements are similar. But if you want to measure it most exactly, look up the right ascension of Pluto and the Eastpoint.

Re: Does the Eastpoint hold any significance?

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:50 am
by Antares5
Jim Eshelman wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:45 am No, Eastpoint is not the same as the Ascendant. It's the point of the ecliptic that squares Midheaven along the equator.

Yes, it is quite important in transits - give it full value. One tricky thing, though: You can't accurately measure the conjunction in longitude. It is measured in right ascension (i.e., along the equator). The good news is that Pluto's latitude is not so great right now, and the two measurements are similar. But if you want to measure it most exactly, look up the right ascension of Pluto and the Eastpoint.
Thank you Jim. I just did it and measured it in right ascension. There isn't much difference (a few arc minutes), but Pluto is even closer to the Eastpoint in RA.