Synastry by parans?
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:03 am
Recent discussions in other threads this week have returned attention to a little-examined approach to synastry, which is aspects by parans. I'm skeptical of the value of these, yet agree they should be explored - simply because they never have.
This brings several complexities. One important complexity, that Mike's TMSA software will resolve, is that one chart has to be precessed to the date of the other so they are on the same playing field. Another complexity is the question of location: While the related-but-quite-distinct mundoscope-to-mundoscope comparison needs to be done inside the framework of one of the charts (and then switch), the paran comparison brings the question of location: The charts need to be for the same latitude. It makes most sense to make this for the location where they both live. (If they don't live in the same location, I'm not sure there is a basis for a paran comparison.
As a single example to demonstrate the approach, I'll compare Marion's and my chart - using the local charts for our home, 34N03'46", 118W18'47". We will pretend that one has been precessed to the other (they have not - but the accrued precession is less than 0°07'). I also have not layered in all the RA squares to meridian (but I think these should be included in a full list approach, or treated separately to get RA squares).
This brings several complexities. One important complexity, that Mike's TMSA software will resolve, is that one chart has to be precessed to the date of the other so they are on the same playing field. Another complexity is the question of location: While the related-but-quite-distinct mundoscope-to-mundoscope comparison needs to be done inside the framework of one of the charts (and then switch), the paran comparison brings the question of location: The charts need to be for the same latitude. It makes most sense to make this for the location where they both live. (If they don't live in the same location, I'm not sure there is a basis for a paran comparison.
As a single example to demonstrate the approach, I'll compare Marion's and my chart - using the local charts for our home, 34N03'46", 118W18'47". We will pretend that one has been precessed to the other (they have not - but the accrued precession is less than 0°07'). I also have not layered in all the RA squares to meridian (but I think these should be included in a full list approach, or treated separately to get RA squares).